Is this with the old beta?  I have fixed many things since then with 0.3.2 including adding a dummy signature and updating the size field of the app.  Those might have something to do with it if the Nspire handles things differently.  Does this happen every time or just sometimes?

I would do a rom clear to get everything back to normal.  Backup your stuff.

Automated Sound Loader/Player:

:.Setup Code
:DiagnosticOff
:0→L
:fnInt(I,6)


:.QuitCode
:LnReg
:Return


:.To Play Music that is pointed to
:Ptr→L


:.To Stop All Music
:0→L


:.To see if any music is currently playing
:If L


:.Music Loader/Player
:Lbl I
:!If L
:1→C
:Return
:End
:ReturnIf C-1→C
:If {L+1}
:Freq({L},2000)
:{L+2→L-1}→C
:Else
:0→L
:End
:Return


:.Music Data should be in this form
:Data(note1,time1,note2,time2,...,lastenote,0)→GDB1


Typical note times in this case are maybe 10 or 20, these aren't the same times as the pause command or anything.  The routines uses L for the loader and C for the counter, you can change these letters to anything you desire.  This can be used for sound effects too, especially with low frequencies (high wave values) and short wait times.

Axe Parser
Gamma 0.3.2

---

Probably one of my largest updates in terms of useful features.

New Features:

• Compile your programs to applications!
• Axioms can be imported for added functionality!
• Custom interrupt support!
• Display Tokens.
• New token value constants.
• Find the length of a zero terminated data block.
• Display small text without defining coordinates first.
• Sound quality has drastically improved.
• Developer information included.

Changed:

• Fixed more bugs with negative numbers (I hate those things!)
• Error scrolling is much cleaner, but still messes up in gigantic programs

I disagree with the claims that there would be too few programs to nominate.  I think ticalc usually gets at least 6 programs nominated per year and that's not including all the notable programs that go under the radar as DJ mentioned.  I think a bimonthly award would have a bare minimum of at least 3 decent nominees (I assume there is just one category and not splitting into separate platforms since that makes more sense for a duration this size) so I don't see any problem with that.

The only other thing I would like to add is that I think we should do the nominations differently than the way ticalc does it. Rather than nominate programs when they come out, I think it would be better to nominate them all at the same time about a week before the voting starts.  It ensures that the number of nominees is not too low or too high since the bar can shift once the knowledge of how many programs released is known.  It also adds a hint of surprise since most people won't know if their entries are going to be nominated or not until the end of the month.

Last thing I want to say is that we should not nominate programs that have been released prior to this award being founded, it wouldn't be fair becasue the time span is too great.

In binary,

%00000001 = 1
%00000010 = 2
apply xor to each bit
%00000011 = 3

Nope.  Say A=6 and B=5 The answer should be 0 since neither condition is true.  But you end up with 1 xor 2 = 3 which is non-zero.

Because then you wouldn't be able to use it with logical operators.  Good luck trying to do A=5 xor (B=3)