Instead of using 27 pixels for a number like 999, you can use only 10 by storing it as binary. Then again, if it is 16-bit color and pxl-Test( can return the precise value, then you will only need one pixel.

I have made BASIC programs that convert pictures to lists or lists to pictures, too I remember I used a picture to store all of the game data for an RPG once and the save screen was kind  of cool because the user could watch their data being modified ^_^

You do have an outdated version of Axe, I already added that optimizaion in 1.2.0.

Darn, I actually do have 1.2.1 in a different folder, I completely forgot about that .__. I am glad that I got something right, though

I'm not so sure that would work, because there's a possible case where you could be running code from an app and finding the Nth string in a large appvar in RAM, for example (which could be more than 16KB in size).

I was worried about that, but I figured that it would be pretty rare. It would definitely be the only scenario that it would fail, too. .__.

That's good news! It wasn't too big of a deal for me since I don't use many equates, but I know how useful include files are.

My plan for an 84+C version is to maintain backwards compatibility. This way programs can be identical and work the same. The main difference will be color and how big pixels are.

Homer-16, that is pretty awesome o.o

Yeah, I am not exactly sure what it is that I made. I know Runer said it was a macro and an IRL friend said it was like a macro that you would use in excel.

@tr1p1ea: I was thinking about that, but the OS doesn't let these hooks work during program execution unless you are at a Pause, Input, Menu( or something similar :[ It would be pretty awesome if it did, though.

So according to them, gravity is nonexistent and objects fall to the earth because the earth is perpetually accelerating upward.

Hmm, disproof:

1] Assume gravity does not exist and that in fact, the earth is perpetually accelerating upward.
2] Ignore the fact that 'up' is defined in relation to the direction of gravity. Assume that 'up' simply means that the earth is accelerating in one direction.
3] Select two objects.
4] Drop object one from a reasonable height, followed by object two.
5] Record the velocity of both objects at any given moment.
6] Note that the velocities are different.

If the Earth was in fact accelerating toward the objects and the objects were in fact not moving relative to the universe, there velocity relative to the Earth would be identical.

It is too bad that it is easily disproven :[ The consequences are mindblowing:
1] Observe the atmosphere.
2] Observe that generally, the atmosphere remains above the Earth.
3] Ask: How does the atmosphere remain above the Earth?
4] By the assumption, there is no gravity and the Earth is moving toward the atmosphere.
5] This means that the Earth is pushing the atmosphere.
6] If the atmosphere is finite, the Earth will push through the atmosphere.
7] Therefore, the atmosphere is infinite.
8] Celestial objects are thus part of the atmosphere and must not be more dense than the atmosphere.
9] What happens to the sun when we no longer see it? o__o

Nice, that seems much better already!