Aww, I posted the same exact code as thepenguin77 over on TIBD But Runer, nice code o.o As long as L1 is 2 elements, that is a great optimisation

I believe the program that converts the ROM tells the user how big it will be on calc.

I've been trying to make the Mandelbrot Set program in Grammer code for a little while (I made my first attempt in August), but something kept bugging out. It turns out, that all I had to do was add in a colon Anyways, this version I threw together yesterday after carefully writing out the code in a notebook

All it does at the moment is show a scaled down view of the MSet. You just run it and it computes the set appropriately. I plan to make it better for exploring the MSet zoomed in (where you can scroll the viewing area dynamically). It isn't nearly as fast as it would be in Axe or Assembly, but it is quite a bit faster than TI-BASIC which is what I was using before

Here is the code:
Repeat !!I: and I<999
ClrDraw
Text(0,0,"ITERATIONS:
expr(Input→I
End
Full
ClrDraw
For(A,0,111
A-64→C
For(B,0,95
B-48→D→H
C→G
For(E,0,I
G-H:*G+H:/ 32:+C→F   ;The space after the / is for using signed division
G*H
+Ans:/ 32:+D→H
If F→G2:+H2:>4096    ;This is G^2 and H^2, respectively, using the squared token
999→E
End
If E<999
Pxl-On(8+B/2,20+A/2
Is>(B
End
Is>(A
DispGraph
End
Stop


Hmm, have you ever created a line drawing routine? Basically, take a point (x1,y1) and (x2,y2), and pretend you are drawing a line between them, but instead of drawing the pixels, use it as a path to draw your bullets. I am sure that finding the velocities would be a lot easier, though. Hopefully somebody comes along that knows more than I do!

Ohaithar.
Zeda E., destroyer of gods here.
Yup, 'tis all.

It might have been a bug in Chrome.

Huh, that is actually weird. I've never had the problem :[ Maybe you added something to your code that caused it?

Yes, it can be used as an extra variable >.> You can store to it, use it for math, and all that good stuff

Also, when I was trying to pass unrecognised tokens to the error handler, I found out that I had broken it. As well, there was another piece of code that has probably been broken for a while that I finally teased out. Anyways, I added these features in all:

• ] can be used to parse an argument where the pointer follows.
• ? is a token that is automatically updated with the program counter whenever there is an error or when you use prgm( as opposed to prgm
• For the error handler only, End) is recognised as a command. This will exit the Error handler without restoring Ans and θ' (this lets you parse unsupported tokens yourself and return values that way).

I am going to see if I can find any more bugs before I release it, though.

EDIT: @Yeong: I saw your review on TICalc, by the way and I've forgotten to mention this:

I just wish that it could support multiple keypresses, though.

You can test directly for keys. For example, getKey(3 lets you test for right and getKey(2 lets you test for left. If you are pressing both keys, a 1 will be returned in both cases.

With the "Full" mode (just like Axe), Grammer programs can be run at amazing 15MHz speed(Of course, the 15MHz limited to 84+SE

Full works on the TI-83+SE, TI-84+, TI-84+SE. Basically, the only calc in the series it won't work on is the TI-83+.