1591
ASM / Re: Calculating angles?
« on: October 29, 2012, 08:15:59 pm »
Wow, that is looking excellent!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1591
ASM / Re: Calculating angles?« on: October 29, 2012, 08:15:59 pm »
Wow, that is looking excellent!
1592
TI-BASIC / Re: Optimization failure led to me not understanding my own code« on: October 29, 2012, 07:22:32 am »
Aww, I posted the same exact code as thepenguin77 over on TIBD
![]() ![]() 1593
TI-BASIC / Re: Getting a program to unarchive another and then run it?« on: October 28, 2012, 07:04:36 pm »
Yeah, if you go with the TPROG idea, you could do something like this:
Code: [Select] "FAKE:XTEMP000 Then you wouldn't even need to worry about archiving/unarchiving ![]() @dinosteven: I believe DoorsCS7 checks if there are any changes from the original program. If there are no changes, it does nothing. (At least I hope Kerm did it that way) 1594
TI-Boy SE - Game Boy Emulator For TI-83+SE/84 / Re: Official TI-Boy SE Beta Thread« on: October 27, 2012, 10:41:39 pm »
I believe the program that converts the ROM tells the user how big it will be on calc.
1595
Grammer / Re: MSet (Grammer)« on: October 25, 2012, 09:24:10 pm »
Thanks
![]() 1596
Grammer / MSet (Grammer)« on: October 25, 2012, 07:28:25 pm »
I've been trying to make the Mandelbrot Set program in Grammer code for a little while (I made my first attempt in August), but something kept bugging out. It turns out, that all I had to do was add in a colon
![]() ![]() All it does at the moment is show a scaled down view of the MSet. You just run it and it computes the set appropriately. I plan to make it better for exploring the MSet zoomed in (where you can scroll the viewing area dynamically). It isn't nearly as fast as it would be in Axe or Assembly, but it is quite a bit faster than TI-BASIC which is what I was using before ![]() Here is the code: Code: [Select] Repeat !!I: and I<999
1597
Casio Calculators / Re: Slope and Yint« on: October 24, 2012, 09:05:21 pm »
I'm not sure about the built in functionality, but applying math knowledge, you can do:
2x-y=1 y=2x-1 y'=2=slope And y-intercept is when x=0, so 2*0-y=1, y=-1. 1598
ASM / Re: Calculating angles?« on: October 23, 2012, 10:09:58 am »
Hmm, have you ever created a line drawing routine? Basically, take a point (x1,y1) and (x2,y2), and pretend you are drawing a line between them, but instead of drawing the pixels, use it as a path to draw your bullets. I am sure that finding the velocities would be a lot easier, though. Hopefully somebody comes along that knows more than I do!
1599
Humour and Jokes / Re: Multicolor domination« on: October 23, 2012, 10:03:06 am »
Wow, that is fascinating!
1600
Humour and Jokes / Re: Juju is God« on: October 23, 2012, 06:48:45 am »
Ohaithar.
Zeda E., destroyer of gods here. Yup, 'tis all. 1601
TI-BASIC / Re: Store a value to an arbitrary variable?« on: October 15, 2012, 08:36:06 pm »
I know I made an asm program a while ago that stores a list of values to real vars. The real vars are named via a string. Other than that, it is not directly possible in TI-BASIC.
1602
TI Z80 / Re: ORG: online Z80 IDE and assembler« on: October 13, 2012, 09:11:01 am »
It might have been a bug in Chrome.
1603
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: October 11, 2012, 05:37:32 pm »
No, that should work. I will test it at some point, but it has worked for me.
1604
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: October 11, 2012, 12:23:31 pm »
Huh, that is actually weird. I've never had the problem :[ Maybe you added something to your code that caused it?
1605
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: October 10, 2012, 06:54:36 am »![]() ![]() |
|