1636
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP
« on: September 17, 2012, 07:47:33 am »
If Grammer gets ported to the TI-86, 4-level grayscale has to come as a standard drawing mode Same for the 89 and 92...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1636
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: September 17, 2012, 07:47:33 am »
If Grammer gets ported to the TI-86, 4-level grayscale has to come as a standard drawing mode Same for the 89 and 92...
1637
BatLib / Re: BatLib« on: September 14, 2012, 09:40:33 am »
Hmm, I did test it and the issue is similar (shading is on the other side). Also, I forgot to release a fixed version for a bug I found a few weeks ago If you have no apps with GroupHook enabled, running BatLib will crash your calc. The fix was simple, but I have to remember to put it on my flashdrive before I come to campus
I still don't know why the shading occurs, though, but I suspect it has to do with GroupHook EDIT: I am pretty sure this is the problem because a certain register isn't preserved (A). When I manually preserved it, it worked fine. 1638
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: September 14, 2012, 09:28:54 am »
If I made a program version, I think it would be around 5000 bytes and be a port of the Grammer 1. The port would probably be smaller and faster than Grammer 1, too, because I optimised a lot of that code in Grammer 2
1639
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: September 12, 2012, 09:03:28 am »
I am not sure if I will have the time for the TI-82/83 port. I would like to finish or at least start it this semester or next winter.
As for Grammer 3, I am not starting it yet (I won't start for another year, probably). The french tutorial is going to be so helpful, thank you for making it! EDIT: Wow, I just glanced at it and it looks amazing! 1640
BatLib / Re: BatLib« on: September 12, 2012, 08:00:46 am »
Wow, that is weird. I am going to need to figure out how it is doing that. It doesn't seem to be setting flags and I am pretty sure all the RAM that I use is decently documented. Have you tried it with the most recent BatLib? (Not BatLibG) I am at school right now and I cannot test on this computer (no USB ports work so I cannot even use Wabbit on my flash drive)
I stopped BatLibG in the last update since the new code for GroupHook was fast enough for my liking. (I just added in GroupHook to the normal BatLib) 1641
TI Z80 / Re: CopyProg« on: September 11, 2012, 12:12:05 pm »
Thanks, that has been a long time. I feel old o.o I think it was a useful update though, and I finally remembered to upload the new version to TICalc (which had only the original version )
1642
TI Z80 / Re: CopyProg« on: September 09, 2012, 05:42:41 pm »
Woo, a small (ish) update is here. Copyprog is now 707 bytes, but I added in the ability to Archive and Unarchive variables (thanks pocketpc for messaging me to do this!) and I also fixed the little GetName bug that made Str1, GDB1, pic1 and other "<<OSvartype>>1" variables from not appearing correctly.
1643
TI Z80 / Re: ORG: online Z80 IDE and assembler« on: September 09, 2012, 04:16:27 pm »
The internet doesn't work yet at home. We are in an apartment that is supposed to have wireless, but the landlords have had issues. We are waiting to be all wired up, now
1644
TI Z80 / Re: ORG: online Z80 IDE and assembler« on: September 09, 2012, 02:48:13 pm »
Yeah, I think line numbers should be fine Thanks!
EDIT: I very much enjoy that I can copy my code from my home computer to a flash drive and then get on a public computer when I am in town and continue programming. This is a great project, Deep Thought! 1645
TI Z80 / Re: ORG: online Z80 IDE and assembler« on: September 07, 2012, 04:36:12 pm »
Hmm, I make a habit of using \ for repetitive code. For example:
Code: [Select] rlca \ rlca \ rlca \ rlca However, ORG seems to have an issue with it .__. Is it possible to modify it to use \ as a newline, or will it be a pain? EDIT: Also, cool autocompletion! 1646
ASM / Re: ASM Command of the Week« on: September 07, 2012, 04:14:24 pm »
Yes, that is what I would try to do, if I can manage it.
1647
ASM / Re: ASM Command of the Week« on: September 07, 2012, 09:07:38 am »
Okay, I will have to experiment a little with that, then. I don't care to use a standard USB protocol, anyways.
1648
TI Z80 / Re: The Impossible Game« on: September 07, 2012, 09:04:32 am »
Yes, porting it should be possible, if anybody was up to the task.
1649
ASM / Re: ASM Command of the Week« on: September 05, 2012, 12:33:48 pm »
Hmm, so if I am reading your post properly, the first code sends 8 bytes to port $A0, and the second writes all the bytes being received, to HL, and then returns the number of bytes that were received? Is USB control that easy?
1650
ASM / Re: ASM Command of the Week« on: September 03, 2012, 08:23:15 am »
I have used these commands to read/write data to the LCD ports.
EDIT: For example, if I wanted to draw a simple sprite, assuming the LCD coordinates are already loaded: Code: [Select] ld bc,0811h ;b=8, size of the sprite, c=11h, the LCD Data port
|
|