2311
ASM / Re: Asm for the TI84+
« on: February 10, 2012, 07:43:40 pm »
No problem
I had similar troubles, too, and I could not find the documentation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cb2a/2cb2ac542a9a167b4a1c5c7b6ff08783e7fbd2d5" alt="Smiley :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3314/c331444902ef10d9c38b52daa41a8d6bfd0acc0b" alt="Undecided :/"
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2311
ASM / Re: Asm for the TI84+« on: February 10, 2012, 07:43:40 pm »
No problem
![]() ![]() 2312
Casio Calculators / Re: Free PRIZM's and ClassPad's« on: February 10, 2012, 07:40:59 pm »would it be ok if I asked for the answers? I'm really busy right now and I don't have time to fill it all out. It's not like I wouldn't be able to answer them on my own..just I'm busyThat is definitely cheating ![]() 2313
TI-Nspire / Re: [Lua] Mancala« on: February 10, 2012, 02:08:50 pm »
I think you have to have made 5 posts before you gain the option to PM (to prevent spambots from sending messages to users and whatnot).
2314
Axe / Re: How to use the link port« on: February 10, 2012, 02:05:58 pm »
My friend does not like me at the moment (we got in an argument), so I could not test between the 84+/SE and the 83+ (he has the 83+). Also, I am still trying to work on exchanging two different sized strings.
2315
Casio Calculators / Re: Free PRIZM's and ClassPad's« on: February 10, 2012, 02:00:54 pm »
Awesome o.o I hope I can obtain one! The Prizm emulator has so far shown me that this calculator was designed for what TI calls "Mathprint" because it is very intuitive. Even methods that are not explained are easily found. For example, I thought:
"It would be cool if I could press the fraction button between two numbers and have it split up as a fraction." And then I thought, "Hmm, let me try this!" Then I tried it and I was like this: ![]() 2316
Casio Calculators / Re: Free PRIZM's and ClassPad's« on: February 10, 2012, 09:57:52 am »i have a question, how do you display the values in the fibinoci sequence like they ask you to in the questions?I don't know if telling you would be considered cheating ![]() 2317
Casio Calculators / Re: Free PRIZM's and ClassPad's« on: February 10, 2012, 08:55:19 am »
I think I am going to give it a try .____. If I do, i can start Casio development o.o I've only ever owned one Casio calc and I never figured out how to use it o.O But I was also pretty young
![]() 2318
Casio Calculators / Re: Free PRIZM's and ClassPad's« on: February 10, 2012, 08:25:33 am »
I wonder if we could get them to sponsor some contests?
2319
ASM / Re: Asm for the TI84+« on: February 10, 2012, 08:23:10 am »
You can download the TI-83+ SDK from education.ti to get a good number of bcalls and what they do. As well, you can use this site to get the details of a large number of otherwise undocumented bcalls:
http://wikiti.brandonw.net/index.php?title=Category:83Plus:BCALLs:By_Name 2320
Axe / Re: How to use the link port« on: February 09, 2012, 05:09:30 pm »![]() ![]() On another note, I tested this twice earlier by sending 255 bytes 100 times and the checksum worked every time ![]() 2321
Axe / Re: How to use the link port« on: February 09, 2012, 02:15:02 pm »
Yes and I found that if I pressed clear while it was still synchronizing it returned 20 every time (on either calculator).
2322
Introduce Yourself! / Re: Hello community!« on: February 09, 2012, 02:13:01 pm »
Or can it be "To whom are you speaking?"
Anyways, I forgot to give you some ![]() 2323
Axe / Re: How to use the link port« on: February 08, 2012, 04:27:11 pm »
Do I send the program to both calcs and then run the program on both?
EDIT: I tried it 10 times on each calculator and they said 190 each time. Also, I even have a bad cord and it worked! +1 ![]() EDIT2: If I can figure out how this code works, can I use it in Grammer? (My link protocol does not work for synchronising and whatnot ![]() 2324
ASM / Re: ASM Command of the Week« on: February 08, 2012, 07:42:22 am »
I often like to use it to return whether a function was successful or not. For example, the c flag here means the pixel was in bounds, so its location was computed normally:
Code: [Select] Sometimes I need to correct an addition or subtraction by also adding or subtracting one:Code: [Select] (There is a better version of that)Also, sometimes there are some very specific adjustments. In this case, you will see scf is used only when the end of the file is met, so an extra 1 must be subtracted to get the line length: Code: [Select]
|
|