I was the first with the version with a menu, but not with the version with scores >.>
And I have my rate button ready
THis really is addicting, I was actually playing a game in class and I never do that

Je ne sais pas

Okay, so I am now one step closer to adding in the Worm Particle in Grammer (I tried earlier, unsuccessfully). Anywho, I was looking at the code for Wormy and I realised two things:
1) Assembly is much faster at shifting data than writing the code purely in Grammer
2) I added inline ASM support to Grammer not too long ago

So now we have the next version of Wormy! Now it can quickly handle very large worms, but the downside is that it can't handle too many all that quickly For example, a worm of length 245 was handled faster than 9 worms of length 5. Still, enjoy!

Okay, I will after I make these changes:
Adding the Worm particles
Adding in the rectangle routine from BatLib. Apparently the border routines cause the calc to freeze At least the BatLib ones will work and it will give you two more methods (shifting the pixels down or up)

No, not those features, sorry Just the ones Sorunome was talking about

I plan to add them as particle forms, so once I add that to Grammer... Yes, a bucket o' worms

Quote from: Xeda112358 on October 24, 2011, 05:58:56 pm

I just remember the difference in speed the particle effects get when translated to assembly, so it would be cool to fill up the screen with worms

Ooh, a suggestion: multiple worms! Having them hit each other would get interesting.

>.>
<.<
You mean like these? I should call it Fighting Worms Look at them tumble over each other like that

Oh, wow That doesn't sound healthy for your calc