Of course assembly would be way faster, but have you tried the standard built in Pxl-On(, Pxl-Off(, Pxl-Change(, Pt-On(, Pt-Off(, Pt-Change(, Line(, and Circle( commands? Also, if you include an extra argument for Circle( of {i it will perform faster (i being the imaginary i).
If you haven't tried Axe yet, I urge you to try that if you want much faster graphics. Just be warned that Axe works a lot closer to assembly, so you can't just press [ON] to break out of infinite loops. For example, if you do While 1:End, you will need to pull a battery and get a RAM clear.
Edit: Also, if you want a pixel based circle (instead of TIs point-based), I think KermM wrote an entirely TI-BASIC routine that performs faster than TIs.
This is.....odd. Which calculator? Did you have an item selected? Which one? Was it a bottle? What was inside the bottle?
TI-84+SE OS 2.55MP (shush, I use it for the extra built in functions ) I tried it at various points in the game including with water selected. It also crashes when I go to use magic, then press down. And occasionally if I die and hit [2nd] too quickly, it glitches to an odd map area and when I move it causes it to crash.
I haven't played an awful lot, but it's fun so far! I have one major bug to report, though: Whenever I press the down arrow when I'm charged for an attack, I get an error (Err:Link I believe) and it causes my calc to freeze and I have to pull a battery.
If 1=1:Then "X*X^2→Str1 "2*3→Str2 ClrHome Disp real(13,Str1) real(13,"X Disp real(13,Str2) End Also, for Batlib commands, of you have an argument of 0 before a string, you can omit it. For example:
ClrHome Disp real(13,dim(11,"DStr1",length(Str1 Disp real(13,dim(11,"DStr2",length(Str2 End As well, if the last few arguments are zero, you can omit them, too.
I'm glad to hear it! Every so often, I take time to look at my code and try to come up with better ways of doing things. who knows, maybe in a few years there will be a Batlib 2
Well, I mean if your code is only working with rational numbers (a/b, with a,b integers and b>0), you can manually keep track of the numerators and denominators. For example, take two numbers, 3/7 and 15/11, and represent them as {3,7->L1:{15,11->L2.
function [] = rhc( r ) %The Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion is a necessary (and frequently %sufficient) method to establish the stability of a single-input, %single-output (SISO), linear time invariant (LTI) control system. %More generally, given a polynomial, some calculations using only the %coefficients of that polynomial can lead us to the conclusion that it %is not stable. %in this program you must give your system coefficents and the %Routh-Hurwitz table would be shown
m=length(r); n=round(m/2); q=1; k=0; for p = 1:length(r) if rem(p,2)==0 c_even(k)=r(p); else c_odd(q)=r(p);
k=k+1; q=q+1; end end a=zeros(m,n);
if m/2 ~= round(m/2) c_even(n)=0; end a(1,:)=c_odd; a(2,:)=c_even; if a(2,1)==0 a(2,1)=0.01; end for i=3:m for j=1:n-1 x=a(i-1,1); if x==0 x=0.01; end
end if a(i,:)==0 order=(m-i+1); c=0; d=1; for j=1:n-1 a(i,j)=(order-c)*(a(i-1,d)); d=d+1; c=c+2; end end if a(i,1)==0 a(i,1)=0.01; end end Right_poles=0; for i=1:m-1 if sign(a(i,1))*sign(a(i+1,1))==-1 Right_poles=Right_poles+1; end end fprintf('\n Routh-Hurwitz Table:\n') a fprintf('\n Number Of Right Poles =%2.0f\n',Right_poles)
fprintf('\n Given Polynomials Coefficents Roots :\n') ROOTS=roots(r)
end
I'm not very familiar with matlab, so I hope this works. Here is the first part:
for j,1,n-1 (order-2*j)*a[i-1,j]->a[i,j] EndFor order-1->order EndIf EndFor 0->Right_poles for i,1,m-1 If sign(a[i,1])*sign(a[i+1,1])=-1:Then Right_poles+1->Right_poles EndIf EndFor
As @E37 said, it would require a parser hook, which is probably overkill. One question I have, though: For what purpose do you need this? Depending on the context, there could be elegant solutions available.
Show Posts
)