---

Latest Update: 29 September 2012 http://ourl.ca/7980/318164

---

I have made mention of this project before, but it was kind of dead at the time. On top of that, I was working on my other project, BASIC ReCode. For the past day or two, I have been working on SpriteLib and yesterday, I had a small breakthrough. I am still working on both projects, but they are going to take turns in my attention. So here is a bit of the background of why I decided to finally make a topic...

I went to bed this morning a little after 2:00 AM. I woke up at 7:30 ish, wondering if I should get up. For about 20 minutes, my sleepy brain made the logical connection that since all I did yesterday was program, it must have been Saturday and so today was Sunday. I fell back asleep deciding I would sleep in and program a little later. An hour later, I jumped out of bed very suddenly, surprising my brain and body. While I tried figuring out what my body was doing, my brain was screaming "CRAAAAAP! IT'S FRIDAY! I HAVE CLASS!" So naturally, I got in the shower, thinking about SpriteLib. Half asleep, my brain started screaming "YOU FORGOT THE 23! THAT WAS THE PROBLEM! READ YOUR OWN NOTES!" So I ran back to my room, got on my computer to see what I was talking about. Sure enough, in the APP that I have been trying to find the error in for four months was missing one byte: a 23 (also known as "inc hl"). After I added the byte (and fixed another call effected by this change), I sent it to my calculator and sure enough, it worked.

So now I get to go through my code, fix any other things modified by this change, and then SpriteLib will be in APP form, using a parser hook with "int(" and no longer relying on Str1 and Str2 for some commands YAYYYYYYY Once I get a few commands finished, I will upload the APP.

EDIT: I am skipping my last class to work on this right now

Here is my best idea...

startTmr→A
Repeat checkTmr(A
End

I have it! This is a hook I just made (with one random function, one cool function, and one really cool function). The trick though is that if you do ln(3), it will return the actual answer. However, ln(0,0) will execute the first function, not ln(

-The functions are 2 key related functions and an advanced function that lets the user edit a program or variable at the byte level.
-This is built off from one of my actual programs that use the int( token, but I changed it to ln( for this purpose

Well, I see a few potential problems. For one, the program won't be called from a fixed location, so that means any calls will be wrong and could crash your calculator. Secondly, if the code executes beyond address BFFFh, I believe the calc automatically crashes.

I always used iPart(, thinking it was faster as well.

* Brandon Wilson jailbreaks a PS3 with a microwave oven!

W00!

YES! Now when I got that microwave, PS3, and Prizm, I can hack my PS3! YEESSSSS. And all I need to do is buy the stuff \(^_^)/

Holy cow! I hope he backed up his code! I want it when I get a microwave of my own!

Okay, so do you want to just unarchive a program? Do you have a pointer already pointing to the VAT?