4606
TI-BASIC / Re: Ticks?
« on: November 19, 2010, 02:21:43 am »
Not a problem! I have made many programs that use time, so I just happened to have an answer
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 4606
TI-BASIC / Re: Ticks?« on: November 19, 2010, 02:21:43 am »
Not a problem! I have made many programs that use time, so I just happened to have an answer
4607
TI-BASIC / Re: Ticks?« on: November 19, 2010, 01:48:29 am »
Here is my best idea...
startTmr→A Repeat checkTmr(A End 4608
Correlation / Re: Correlation: Vote on Output( with restricted arguments or ln(« on: November 18, 2010, 11:14:58 pm »
This difference is not noticeable from what I can see. Maybe a hundred thousandths of a second slower by my calculation...
4609
Correlation / Re: Correlation: Vote on Output( with restricted arguments or ln(« on: November 18, 2010, 10:40:06 pm »
I have it! This is a hook I just made (with one random function, one cool function, and one really cool function). The trick though is that if you do ln(3), it will return the actual answer. However, ln(0,0) will execute the first function, not ln(
-The functions are 2 key related functions and an advanced function that lets the user edit a program or variable at the byte level. -This is built off from one of my actual programs that use the int( token, but I changed it to ln( for this purpose 4610
Axe / Re: Executing nostub progs« on: November 18, 2010, 09:15:08 pm »
Sorry, it looks like a few other posts occurred before I finished... Okay, it looks like there are some working ideas.
4611
Axe / Re: Executing nostub progs« on: November 18, 2010, 09:02:37 pm »
Well, I see a few potential problems. For one, the program won't be called from a fixed location, so that means any calls will be wrong and could crash your calculator. Secondly, if the code executes beyond address BFFFh, I believe the calc automatically crashes.
4612
ASM / Re: Coding ASM by hand« on: November 18, 2010, 08:54:37 pm »
It depends on how complex it is. Unfortunately, I stopped making games over a year ago and I haven't had the creative juice for one since.
4613
Other Calculators / Re: How can one remove a TI-84+(SE) from push-to-test mode with no link cable?« on: November 18, 2010, 08:28:31 pm »
I always used iPart(, thinking it was faster as well.
4614
News / Re: Netham45 jailbreaks microwave with Casio Prizm prototype« on: November 18, 2010, 08:09:30 pm »
Wait, can said MP3 player be programmed, too? That would be pretty cool... I love the z80 processor now that I can program it...
4615
News / Re: Netham45 jailbreaks microwave with Casio Prizm prototype« on: November 18, 2010, 07:42:57 pm »
YES! Now when I got that microwave, PS3, and Prizm, I can hack my PS3! YEESSSSS. And all I need to do is buy the stuff \(^_^)/ 4616
News / Re: Netham45 jailbreaks microwave with Casio Prizm prototype« on: November 18, 2010, 06:33:04 pm »
Wait a minute, this is some kind of joke isn't it?
Wait, never mind, it has special colored text which means it is important news, so it must be real. For second my dreams were crushed. 4617
News / Re: Netham45 jailbreaks microwave with Casio Prizm prototype« on: November 18, 2010, 06:27:58 pm »
Holy cow! I hope he backed up his code! I want it when I get a microwave of my own!
4618
Correlation / Re: Correlation: Vote on Output( with restricted arguments or ln(« on: November 18, 2010, 05:45:46 pm »
That's what I said
4619
ASM / Re: Archiving/Unarchiving a VAT pointer - request« on: November 18, 2010, 05:43:52 pm »
Okay, so do you want to just unarchive a program? Do you have a pointer already pointing to the VAT?
4620
Correlation / Re: Correlation: Vote on Output( with restricted arguments or ln(« on: November 18, 2010, 05:39:38 pm »
I went with ln(, too, because I know how much Output( hates anybody trying to parse it themselves Plus, I only use ln( on my 89.
|
|