Overall, the one thing I like best about Grammer is that you can make programs as quickly as you can in BASIC. If you test the program and you need to change something, just press ON to break the program, edit the code, and run it again-- no need to compile the source. It is also why I like programming in hexadecimal. It is often more efficient for how quickly you can program something.

However, if you need something to be really fast, I would go with Axe since it is highly efficient and a lot faster to code in than Assembly (if you are used to Axe).

Well, the code currently replaces the data with data not usable in the TI-BASIC editor (which is why I haven't officially added it). Otherwise, all labels would get replaced

sin() and cos() in Grammer are basically the same as in Axe. It returns a value from -127 to 127, so when you multiply by 100, it goes way off screen. Here is my rendition:
.0:Return
0→A→E
Repeat getKey(15
ClrDraw
IS>(A       ;just to increment A
Text('ºA and 255
62+sin(A
/ 2→B
94+cos(A
/ 2→C
Line('47,31,C,B
Line('48,31,C+1,B
Line('47,32,C,B+1
DispGraph
End
Stop


Today is the final day I think there are about 8 hours left!

I think I will wait until I have the calculator so that I can test the changes.

Hmm, I don't think I ever documented the Plot1( and Plot2( commands for Grammer. I started making an experimental version last night and I added in a few other special commands. Plot1( will return the value of the byte directly following it and Plot2( will return the value of the two-byte word directly following it. These are more useful if a program was *cough*  compiled since you cannot directly use byte and word values from the BASIC editor.
Not to get anybodies hopes up, but I did start trying to make a compiler for an unofficial version of Grammer. If it speeds things up nicely, I might include it in an official release.

I made a program that generates a Sierpinski's Triangle, but then I made it map all of the points in the triangle to a circle instead. I had a fun time yesterday working out how to even do that, but it is a 1-1 map, too, and warps it nicely

By the way guys, SHUT UP! Stop trying to tell others how to hack the restrictions on  internet! Look, if there are restrictions put in place, THEY ARE THERE FOR A VERY GOOD REASON. My parents know their sh*t. I trust them to do what's best for me. I'm not trying to undermine what they're doing. In fact, I'm sitting behind them helping them remove objectionable content from my home computer. I'm ashmed of what I'm doing.

I tend to be fundamentally opposed to restricting access to knowledge that is derived purely from our mental ability. (I add this odd language to distinguish knowledge gained through harm, such as knowledge of what it feels like to torture or murder.)

I think instead of telling them to stop teaching how to bypass restrictions, let them provide the methods without encouraging others to use these methods-- that is the real harm. If we are going to teach dangerous knowledge, be sure to teach that it is not to be put to ill use. It is like training in martial arts-- you gain skills that can be deadly, but you learn to use it only in the most extreme of circumstances.

There might be those who think that a child will never have sufficient reason to go against the wishes of their parents, but I can assure that there are such extreme circumstances.

@Dapianokid:
Anyways, with that out of the way, I wish you luck and happiness! By the way, you posted in another topic that you wanted to know how to program hex-- your internet restriction is the first step I didn't have internet access (or computer access, actually) when I started programming.