This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - bb010g
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 34
106
« on: August 09, 2014, 06:00:03 pm »
Well, I could remove the _ in mapM_ if some garbage looking like [(),(),(),()] below the output is okay. But other than that, I ran out of ideas.
In other news, I reduced my Java program size by 4 bytes, so I claim the first place in that category again.  The XTend entry is also reduced by 7 bytes. And finally there is a new C entry with 154 bytes.
That should be fine; I did so. That last byte is a killer, though.
* bb010g pokes JWinlow23 to remove the underscore from 3298's answer
I did. Did you see the size change?
* bb010g derps Thought he was at 70 instead of 71 before. 
107
« on: August 09, 2014, 05:54:15 pm »
Well, I could remove the _ in mapM_ if some garbage looking like [(),(),(),()] below the output is okay. But other than that, I ran out of ideas.
In other news, I reduced my Java program size by 4 bytes, so I claim the first place in that category again. The XTend entry is also reduced by 7 bytes. And finally there is a new C entry with 154 bytes.
That should be fine; I did so. That last byte is a killer, though. * bb010g pokes JWinlow23 to remove the underscore from 3298's answer
108
« on: August 08, 2014, 01:33:50 pm »
Looks like things are getting pretty heated in the Haskell category! 3298 and bb010g are slashing bytes like crazy! Only thing to wonder now is, when will they stop? (And will it be before the competition's over?) This could be the end, considering that we have the same score now. Maybe we hit the global optimum. 
70 bytes.  Edit: Just because I can, I made an x86 ASM version. I didn't expect it to become small, and it's much bigger than anything mentioned here.  Oh well, it's not a suitable language for Code Golf. I'm not submitting it, so if you want to see the source, ask me.
I use just the Unix sys_write and sys_exit calls, no trickery with the C standard library. It compiles to 838 bytes, and after treating it with strip, it's at 444. The source is 516 bytes long, but I could get rid of some formatting to get that down to 465, maybe even further.
Why not submit it? It's an entry, even if the language is verbose. EDIT: BOO YAH! 68 bytes, same as Perl. 
109
« on: August 07, 2014, 06:20:55 pm »
71 bytes of Haskell. 
110
« on: August 07, 2014, 04:22:50 pm »
How the heck did you compress the Haskell code like that  ... nevermind, got 71 bytes now, assuming Unix-style line endings (with DOS-style 2-byte line endings it's 72). Take that!
Edit: Also cut down the SysRPL program size to 63.5. I don't expect to be able to compete with CJam and Golfscript, but at least SysRPL is useful for real problems.
DAAAAAAAAAANG. * bb010g opens up GHCi again
111
« on: August 06, 2014, 07:26:56 pm »
\o/ 77 bytes in Haskell!
112
« on: August 04, 2014, 08:22:23 pm »
You should stick Next/Previous links in each of these Contest posts.
113
« on: August 04, 2014, 07:54:22 pm »
Reminds me of Chore Wars.
114
« on: August 04, 2014, 07:24:05 pm »
85 bytes of Haskell.
115
« on: August 03, 2014, 01:39:23 am »
7015: To you, everyone on Omni is:
|
/|\
/\
Wat?
116
« on: August 03, 2014, 01:34:05 am »
Just finished setting up my computer again with Xubuntu and Windows 8. Not dual-boot—Windows 8 is running in VirtualBox in Seamless mode
[img width=900]http://img.ourl.ca/41%20PM.png[/img]
What XFCE theme is that? (Also, how'd you get the workspace widget that small (if that is it in the upper left corner)?)
117
« on: July 31, 2014, 01:41:07 pm »
When you get a prototype working, please post about it here. Not very many people doing custom calcs. 
118
« on: July 31, 2014, 01:16:38 pm »
119
« on: July 15, 2014, 10:37:06 pm »
120
« on: July 14, 2014, 09:50:27 pm »
Could be used internally for developing calculator software? Since it's accessible from recovery mode. Just throwing ideas out there.
If so, it could be useful for hooking Linux in.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 34
|
Show Posts
