961
News / Re: The Future of Calculators
« on: June 09, 2011, 02:32:34 pm »
This is great! You've earned a +1 respect!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 961
News / Re: The Future of Calculators« on: June 09, 2011, 02:32:34 pm »
This is great! You've earned a +1 respect!
962
ASM / Re: Compile Time error, what is wrong?« on: June 08, 2011, 03:10:29 pm »EDIT: ah, nevermind, Runer has already answered that (I was 19 secounds to late) 963
ASM / Re: an other assembly question« on: June 08, 2011, 03:07:31 pm »I remember one time when I was working on Pyoro I had the weirdest bug that seemingly occurred at random and couldn't be traced back anywhere. It took me a week to find but eventually, I found it and fixed it. I had forgotten to back up the ix register during my interrupt routine. If you're using custom interrupts, make sure the routine is working right.I don't use custom interrupts. I turn interupts off at the beginning of my program, and turn them back on at the end of my program. I never had problems with this, so I don't see why it would give problems now. Further, my program is only 2kb in size(on the calc), including a large LUT and a list of variables. Also, replacing the instructions with nops (even with a lot of them) doesn't let my program crash screenx and screeny are variables defined in the program itself, so i'm not overwriting any OS vars. I also tried to push ix at the beginning of my program, and pop it afterward. This didn't help either 964
ASM / Re: an other assembly question« on: June 06, 2011, 04:00:49 pm »0A18 is part of the OS, you want to try to figure out where execution leaves your code. Your code will be in the $9D95 - ~$B000 range depending on program size.Do you mean this could be a bug in latenite? EDIT: an other assembler does just the same 965
Other Calc-Related Projects and Ideas / Re: TILP: beta-testing...« on: June 06, 2011, 02:34:10 pm »
Thanks. It all works now
966
ASM / Re: an other assembly question« on: June 06, 2011, 02:23:07 pm »
It crashed on adress 0A18, which is a jump instruction
btw, here's the code for the neg instructions: Code: [Select] NegHL:
967
Other Calc-Related Projects and Ideas / Re: TILP: beta-testing...« on: June 05, 2011, 03:50:43 pm »
that one is corrupted too
968
Other Calc-Related Projects and Ideas / Re: TILP: beta-testing...« on: June 05, 2011, 03:47:57 pm »
I did't mean the installer of ti-lp, i meant the installer of the gfm alone on ticalc (in the 'windows link software' category)
969
Miscellaneous / Re: Post your desktop« on: June 05, 2011, 03:29:43 pm »I think i'm going to keep it like this anyway.Personalization Settings, accessed through Panel Control.Why do you use the old theme?becouse i don't know how to set the theme btw i can't even find the personalisation settings. 970
Miscellaneous / Re: Post your desktop« on: June 05, 2011, 03:26:16 pm »Why do you use the old theme?becouse i don't know how to set the theme 972
Other Calc-Related Projects and Ideas / Re: TILP: beta-testing...« on: June 05, 2011, 02:46:04 pm »
Well, it does complain abouth that: (and yes, i already tried reinstalling)
973
ASM / Re: an other assembly question« on: June 05, 2011, 02:37:56 pm »
Yes, that routine has a ret behind it, i just forgot to copy it.
MulFP looks like this: Code: [Select] MulFP: and it uses the Mul16 routine which looks like this:Code: [Select] Mul16: ; This routine performs the operation DEHL=BC*DE The only thing that i was able to find out while debugging was that it repeated some code over and over again. That was by repeating step by step. as soon as i click 'run', the calc crashes. Further, i found out that when i call the routine twice, it doesn't clear the ram but ends the program. 975
ASM / an other assembly question« on: June 04, 2011, 07:33:52 pm »
I don't really get this:
In the left part, it clears the ram, while in the right part, it doesn't clear the ram while i have only comented out a few ld commands. coul someone help please? |
||||
|