16
TI Z80 / Re: Factorials in TI-BASIC
« on: March 15, 2014, 01:05:48 pm »
Maybe it was a mistake in the prompt.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 16
TI Z80 / Re: Factorials in TI-BASIC« on: March 15, 2014, 01:05:48 pm »
Maybe it was a mistake in the prompt.
17
TI Z80 / Re: Factorials in TI-BASIC« on: March 15, 2014, 12:13:08 pm »The challenge asked to display only up to 135!Yes, but YOU try to display 310 digits on one screen at one time any other way.That's an original idea, but it makes the digits hard to read.One problem: How did you display 171! if it didn't fit on the screen?I squished the numbers together, like this: 18
TI Z80 / Re: Factorials in TI-BASIC« on: March 15, 2014, 11:52:34 am »That's an original idea, but it makes the digits hard to read.One problem: How did you display 171! if it didn't fit on the screen?I squished the numbers together, like this: 19
TI Z80 / Re: Factorials in TI-BASIC« on: March 15, 2014, 11:24:55 am »
One problem: How did you display 171! if it didn't fit on the screen?
20
TI Z80 / Re: Factorials in TI-BASIC« on: March 14, 2014, 05:00:54 pm »
Mine can calculate (but not display) up to 999! It does it a lot faster too.
22
TI Calculators / Re: Upgrade TI -83 Plus to TI 84« on: March 13, 2014, 03:53:34 pm »Using anything possible (jacking included), is it possible to upgrade a TI 83 to a TI 84?No, or at least it's easier to work the required hours to earn money for an 84+/SE. 23
General Calculator Help / Re: What do you think can be improved on with the TI 84« on: March 13, 2014, 12:00:49 am »Sorry, I give up. I just don't understand. I sadly never used anything other than TI-83+ BASIC and am still very new to HP Prime PPL so I would probably need to learn TI-89 BASIC in order to understand, especially that I only learn with concrete examples.Also, u=expr(string(u, provided u exists. Just as you aren't limited to passing variables to expr(, neither are you to string(. 24
General Calculator Help / Re: What do you think can be improved on with the TI 84« on: March 12, 2014, 11:56:44 pm »Oh ok you mean it's like a var->str command?It can take any value. 25
General Calculator Help / Re: What do you think can be improved on with the TI 84« on: March 12, 2014, 11:54:39 pm »And what would it display? I am kinda curious how this syntax and regular str/sub/instring syntax would compare. I never used a string() command before on any calc.The same way it works on the TI-89. It returns the value of A in a string. In otherwords, A=expr(string(A. 26
General Calculator Help / Re: What do you think can be improved on with the TI 84« on: March 12, 2014, 11:52:29 pm »I wonder how the syntax would look like?string(A 27
General Calculator Help / Re: What do you think can be improved on with the TI 84« on: March 12, 2014, 11:50:30 pm »What would string do that Sub(), Instring() and Str1 to Str0 cannot?Do it faster and with no auxiliary variables. 28
Other Calc-Related Projects and Ideas / Re: New Ideas for Calculators« on: March 12, 2014, 11:48:18 pm »
One that's actually programmable (for the lack of a better term)?
29
General Calculator Help / Re: What do you think can be improved on with the TI 84« on: March 12, 2014, 11:45:46 pm »
I'd like for TI to scrap the idea of MP, and allow reading variables from the archive. And, for Astley's sake, a string() command! Is it that hard to include one?
30
TI-BASIC / Re: Best TI-BASIC command of all time?« on: March 12, 2014, 11:43:57 pm »
My personal choices would be Repeat (such a shame that it's not in the TI-89 languages) and expr(.
|
|