I would like to thank Xeda112358, jacobly, and Runer112 for a tremendous amount of assistance with these programs.
Sources:
http://pastebin.com/8dsQcwLN (8)
and
http://pastebin.com/Tb84GFXg (16)

Syntax:
{row, col, val}
The rows and columns start with 0, to save memory and to allow you to write 9 when you need to use 10 for Output, as an additional memory saver.
P. S. I completely forgot to say that the text will be drawn aligned to the right. So the second entry must be the column of the rightmost digit.
P. P. S. Turns out that I completely wasted my time on these programs.

Keepin' it classy

How do you do that?

I know that when Minecraft came out in late 2010, afterward the whole TI community started stagnating. The same thing happened in 2005 when World of Warcraft became popular. Lots of formerly active members moving on to Minecraft. Of course there were other causes, such as the Omni vs Cemetech drama in mid 2011, along with how TI treated the TI-Nspire community back then.

First, it was 2009. Second, why not make a policy restricting Minecraft play? Then everyone who wants to break it will leave.

As I wrote in the other topic, the size limit has been meaningless for practical purposes nearly since its inception, in the 20th century
There are several multi-chunk ASM programs which use 100+ KB of code in RAM.
GTC is a FlashApp because having the code execute in RAM would have severely reduced the amount of RAM available for storing compilation data and/or the speed. For functionality and optimization reasons, it's mostly compiled with TIGCC/GCC4TI to COFF object files, the toolchain in TIFS is used mainly for the final FlashApp production.

OK, I'll try to get the IDE to be a flash app, then, since I don't know much about using multi-chunk ASM programs; besides, the RAM needs to be used for the TI-Basic programs to edit.

Not sure what you mean: we can sign TI-68k FlashApps with TI's private key, and they're accepted by pristine OS versions.

I meant that we don't have the private key. Or do we now?

Is the slowdown from calling C/ASM from BASIC due to having to search through the VAT like on Z80 calcs? I remember that calling ASM programs from Z80 BASIC was very slow because of that and it would get worse and worse as your RAM got lower, so people relied on Flash APPS that installed ASM libs via parser hooks instead, which was much faster.

Even if it were so, we still wouldn't be able to sign flashapps that would work on TI-89s without patches.

Yes; however, I also need one that word-wraps.

Yep, it's true that few people program in C for the 68k series.