This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - blue_bear_94
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 68
406
« on: February 23, 2013, 11:39:39 am »
Note that the OS is made to test both ASM and TI-BASIC programs. That includes ASM programs taking advantage of BCalls, so we can't assume that none of them will be used; same for the saferam areas.
407
« on: February 23, 2013, 11:37:46 am »
On the TI-68k series, tiosmod+amspatch alleviates the performance problems, and we can re-sign the OS for seamless transfer..
That's what I meant by the performance problems being "fixable." However, we can still send our user-made OSes on emulators, and we don't need to send them to our actual calcs.
408
« on: February 23, 2013, 11:32:28 am »
However, user-made OSes will have to emulate the behavior of both assembly and TI-Basic routines, without using TI's code.
409
« on: February 23, 2013, 11:29:44 am »
This means in particular that we can not use the calculator on the same typing speed as the old calculators. We must wait until the screen refresh is completed, or some keypresses are going to be ignored.
For example in the video below, I press four times the right arrow at the same speed on TI-84 Plus and TI-84 Plus C Silver Edition to navigate the menus. The TI-84 Plus C Silver Edition ignores half of my keypresses! :O
I admit that it is quite painful when using the TI-Basic editor in insert mode or when you are at the bottom of the screen, but maybe it's because I'm too accustomed to previous TI-z80 models and a new user wouldn't mind?
Same for the TI-89 Titanium... The CSE isn't the only model with this problem. However, the 68k series's key delay can still be fixed.
410
« on: February 23, 2013, 11:27:21 am »
I wish my school were like that.
411
« on: February 23, 2013, 08:36:30 am »
I'm getting a Casio Prizm soon. Do you know any emulators other than Casio's?
412
« on: February 23, 2013, 08:33:49 am »
But wouldn't the ROM include TI's OS?
413
« on: February 22, 2013, 08:31:00 pm »
Yay! Another test version.
Unfortunately, due to TI's EULA, this will be the last until that stupid emulator clause is lifted.
I would have provided the C source, but what use is it without being able to use TI's OS on TIEmu?
By the way, I provided one easy installation program for your disposal.
414
« on: February 22, 2013, 05:31:07 pm »
As you know, TI is keeping us from using any of their stuff (including the OSes!) on emulators not from TI. ( http://ourl.ca/18393) I'm planning to protest against this injustice at my school. You can do the same. What do you think?
415
« on: February 22, 2013, 04:59:27 pm »
I believe that it would be almost impossible to create a system that cannot be circumvented. But also, there is practically no way for TI to know whether we're using their stuff on our emulators.
416
« on: February 22, 2013, 04:36:35 pm »
Actually, the Nspire CX costs more. And at least Casio isn't actively trying us to stop programming.
Also, I wasn't bashing about the 84C. I was just mentioning that FF had a banner not too different from mine.
417
« on: February 22, 2013, 04:31:32 pm »
or a finished top-down shooter.
I could write a bullet hell, especially if there isn't already one.
418
« on: February 22, 2013, 04:30:36 pm »
I made something small for this catastrophe. And sure, I'll play the sound and get my parents to let me buy a Prizm. Alarm
419
« on: February 22, 2013, 04:25:07 pm »
Any ideas on what to do on the Prizm, then?
420
« on: February 22, 2013, 04:19:41 pm »
Nope. Only a TI-84 + SE and a TI-89 Titanium. However, I'm planning on get a Prizm due to TI's addendum on its EULA: You may not use the Licensed Materials on any emulator of a TI calculator unless the emulator is obtained from TI.
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 68
|
Show Posts