781
OmnomIRC Development / Re: σ
« on: June 15, 2012, 07:26:04 pm »
Umm... may I see what it looked like please?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 781
OmnomIRC Development / Re: σ« on: June 15, 2012, 07:26:04 pm »
Umm... may I see what it looked like please?
782
Calculator C / Re: [68k] Storing a value into n?« on: June 15, 2012, 11:09:28 am »
On 2nd thought, I am going to use an array of 16 FILE structures, and have the user refer to them by indices (0 to 15). With any file-writing operation, I will update the appropriate element. For fopen and fclose, I might have
Code: [Select] case 24:
783
News / Re: TI-Nspire OS 3.2 is out!« on: June 14, 2012, 01:21:42 pm »
Has that not been said at least 12 times already?
785
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 14, 2012, 10:40:48 am »
TI: TI-92, Casio: Classpad 300
786
Humour and Jokes / Re: 9001 signs you're addicted to calcs and Omni« on: June 14, 2012, 09:33:47 am »
2907: Your PC crashed so you use your calculator.
787
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 14, 2012, 09:29:57 am »
(Casio, 2011; TI, never?)
1st calc to be banned from almost all standardized tests: TI: 1995, Casio: 2003 788
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 14, 2012, 09:14:22 am »
I saw it being done in middle school and no later. In 7th grade we used TI-83+SEs and in 8th we used 84+s. After that we used our own.
Also, put in "1st post-2000 calc to officially suck" (2007 for TI). 789
ASM / Re: A question« on: June 13, 2012, 03:21:12 pm »
But can you do it from a place other than a homescreen, i. e. inside another program?
790
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 13, 2012, 02:46:37 pm »
Also, does TI ever advertise their calcs on TV?
791
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 13, 2012, 02:45:06 pm »
As for the f***ing s*** that should have never happened, red for first, green for last, and in the middle, regular black.
Also, I'm not sure about the first HP graphing calculator. 792
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 13, 2012, 02:40:13 pm »
You could also add "1st graphing calc," which is 1990 for TI, 1985 for Casio, and 1987 for HP.
793
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 13, 2012, 02:35:22 pm »
You should change the text to "1st calculator to get bricked" then. However, you can brick older TI calculators...
794
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 13, 2012, 02:29:46 pm »
Also, what's with the self-destructing calculators?
795
Other Calculators / Re: Where do TI and Casio win on an hardware/dev point?« on: June 13, 2012, 02:10:48 pm »
The TI-85 was released in 1993, and had a 128x64 screen. So, by "1st screen bigger than 96x64," TI should have 1993, not 1995. It was also the first to unofficially support assembly and have at least 20KB of RAM, so TI should have 1993 by "1st calc to unofficially support ASM" and "1st calc with at least 20KB of user RAM." Also, the TI-83+/84+SE released in 2004 had 2 MB of Flash, and the 89 Titanium/Voyage 200 had 4 MB (1.5MB and 2.7MB user respectively). The TI-83+SE was released in 2001, so "1st calc with at least 1 MB of Flash" should be 2001 for TI, not 2007. HP's first calc with at least 20KB of user RAM was released in 1990 (HP-48GX, 128KB), maybe sooner. The HP 49G+, released in 2003, was the first HP calc with flash and at least 1 MB.
Another field to see is "1st calc with a CAS:" 1995 for TI. |
|