151
ASM / Re: A Couple of Technical Questions
« on: September 29, 2011, 10:03:00 pm »
As far as I am aware, yes. (Until an interrupt is triggered, of course.)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
ASM / Re: A Couple of Technical Questions« on: September 29, 2011, 10:03:00 pm »
As far as I am aware, yes. (Until an interrupt is triggered, of course.)
152
ASM / Re: A Couple of Technical Questions« on: September 29, 2011, 04:56:28 pm »
I meant relative to the whole instruction. Does doing that make the hardware implementation simpler?
153
ASM / Re: A Couple of Technical Questions« on: September 29, 2011, 04:47:13 pm »
1. LDIR does not change PC until BC=0. So, if the processor is interrupted while LDIR'ing, it just returns to performing LDIR.
2. More or less, yes, though in a low-power mode. 154
The Axe Parser Project / Re: Axe Parser« on: September 25, 2011, 09:21:23 pm »
Distribution to friends?
But there isn't too much need for integration with the presence of DuckSign. 155
Other / Re: What computer OS do you use?« on: September 16, 2011, 01:09:23 am »
I myself fairly recently installed Gentoo and with some luck will soon entirely replace Fedora with it.
Anyone besides jkag (IIRC) and me use Gentoo? Edit: Given that some options in the poll have only one vote, someone mind adding Gentoo to it? 156
General Calculator Help / Re: Ti-84 plus operating systems« on: September 15, 2011, 09:57:51 pm »
Alternatively, BrandonW also created a modified 2.43 .8xu to be accepted by 1.03, which means you don't have to go through the risks of boot-code modding.
157
Other / Re: What computer OS do you use?« on: September 15, 2011, 09:54:24 pm »Fedora for developing too (they only install Fedora @ my school )Better than my school; they have a cut-down version of XP. 158
News / Re: Omnimaga Rules Update« on: September 13, 2011, 09:12:20 pm »
Names help indeed. With modern languages comments are less necessary since it's often apparent what the code does. The extreme version of the maintainability problem is not knowing why some complex/heavily optimized assembly code that you wrote is buggy (which has happened to me, hence my caution )
159
News / Re: Omnimaga Rules Update« on: September 13, 2011, 09:07:22 pm »
Have either of you ever successfully understood your own code after not having seen it for long periods of time? Coding w/o comments might be fine just to get working code, but it does awful things to maintainability.
(Of course, both of you have probably heard this before; note that this is meant to be constructive criticism, not anything negative, and that I'm not saying directly that you're doing it wrong. ) 160
TI Z80 / Re: zStart - an app that runs on ram clears« on: September 08, 2011, 12:49:37 am »Would it be possible to have an option to turn these deleted versions into nondeleted Appvars?In-place, no. A new appvar would have to be created with a copy of the contents. (Note that "turn ... into" implies in-place) 161
Calculator C / Re: Problem with C code« on: September 08, 2011, 12:47:25 am »Just as a side note, it is more efficient to do ++w. So if you don't need the value of w before it's incremented, then use ++w instead.Except any good compiler will compile "w++" to the same as "++w" if the result isn't used. (I know the discussion ephan linked says that this might not be the case sometimes, but that's for C++) If precedent helps, I've always seen it written postfix for the loop increment. 162
Miscellaneous / Re: I got A ti-83PSE« on: September 07, 2011, 07:52:35 pm »
Did you buy a silverlink cable to go with it? Else you won't be able to transfer programs etc.
163
Site Feedback and Questions / Re: Our current problem II« on: September 06, 2011, 09:06:24 pm »What a sec, did jkag just get banned?Since you ask, yes, he has a 7-day ban for what should be obvious reasons. Just as a warning, don't bash his actions, as this won't help anything (not to mention that several others have already done so ) Edit: ninja'd 164
Site Feedback and Questions / Re: Our current problem II« on: September 06, 2011, 08:45:52 pm »
From Google: "concord: 1. Agreement or harmony between people or groups."
Basically, you and I are in agreement about this. (inasmuch as I can tell) 165
Site Feedback and Questions / Re: Our current problem II« on: September 06, 2011, 08:42:07 pm »Yeah it definitively needs to be said in a way that is less offensive as Jkag's. For example your comment should be prefixed with a comment saying you have nothing against gay people. I just think that on Omni, bigotry should be frowned upon.I read [present tense] this and agree wholeheartedly Okay, we have two people in concord, who's next? |
|