This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - calcdude84se
Pages: 1 ... 134 135 [136] 137 138 ... 161
2026
« on: June 21, 2010, 08:28:41 pm »
Cool, I may try this later. Thanks for the link!
2027
« on: June 21, 2010, 08:18:13 pm »
EPIC. And you made it blue  Builderboy, seconded.
2028
« on: June 21, 2010, 08:13:44 pm »
That. is. Awesome. Amazing find, Sir. 
2029
« on: June 21, 2010, 07:56:57 pm »
We didn't scare her away, right? (I feel bad if we did...) Yeah, nobody should be scared off of the forums. Come back! Well, we'll see sooner or later, I guess..
2030
« on: June 20, 2010, 10:15:34 pm »
2031
« on: June 20, 2010, 10:07:41 pm »
Well, 65532 is -4, so that means that A<<-5 is always true... which means A>>5 is always false (because 4<<-5 is 0), which means you're always trying values between -32768 and 5. Do other numbers outside of this range work?
2032
« on: June 20, 2010, 09:59:15 pm »
The greater than sign should also be signed, like ">>", since -5, 65531 rather, is greater than 5.
2033
« on: June 20, 2010, 09:34:49 pm »
As in, my code and yours? What compiler version are you using?
calc84: I never liked routines optimized so much they became obfuscated, and this is one of them. I'll look at it in more detail, though.
Edit: Just for clarification, I know that routine is part of Axe, not calc84's.
2034
« on: June 20, 2010, 09:08:55 pm »
132. You use your calculator as a keyboard for everything, since it acts as a USB keyboard (with your 83+, of course)
2035
« on: June 20, 2010, 09:03:49 pm »
It doesn't work? Hmm... I mean, it'd fail if A wrapped around to positive, but that's in the 30 thousands.
I'll try some code and edit/post.
Edit: I just tried this code:
-7->A
If A<<-5
4->A
End
Disp A>Dec,iAnd it displayed "4". What piece of code of yours is failing?
2036
« on: June 20, 2010, 09:00:52 pm »
You can do matrices already, albeit indirectly. For a matrix with X columns and Y rows, for example, you can access (A,B) (with A being the column and B the row, indexed from 0) with {B*X+A+GDB1} (assuming the data is ordered a row at a time, beginning at GDB1) As for a direct method, it might cause too much overhead, though, even if it didn't (I can already think of an implementation where everything that can be figured out is at compile time), I'm not sure it would be added. That would be up to Quigibo. So, rather, you would like a direct, simple-looking way to use matrices. (Actually, these are really just two-dimensional arrays, but w/e. You're not getting matrix multiplication in Axe except by your own subroutine )
2037
« on: June 20, 2010, 05:22:33 pm »
^ That's because it's still on his desktop
2038
« on: June 20, 2010, 05:21:11 pm »
qazz, you may want to upload that Yeah, this looks amazing. Too bad TI-Connect is stupid... (speaking of not being able to handle large files, I can't get my 606KB app from my calc to TI-Connect )
2039
« on: June 20, 2010, 04:39:25 pm »
lol, interesting find.
2040
« on: June 20, 2010, 01:07:28 pm »
Oops... I forgot to try it. Will do now.
Pages: 1 ... 134 135 [136] 137 138 ... 161
|
Show Posts
