466
ASM / Re: What assembly languages do you know?
« on: April 22, 2011, 09:31:05 pm »
z80 for me
I'll change it
I'll change it
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 466
ASM / Re: What assembly languages do you know?« on: April 22, 2011, 09:31:05 pm »
z80 for me
I'll change it 467
The Axe Parser Project / Re: Features Wishlist« on: April 22, 2011, 08:31:53 pm »
*calcdude/calcdude84se/calcdude84pse
Actually, what I proved is that " and " etc. are bitwise and not logical. A more realistic example than the "1 and 2" one is in the potential optimization of this code segment: Code: [Select] If A=/=0 and (B=/=0 You might think "Hey, it's testing =/=0; I can just remove that!" But, if A=1 and B=2, for example, "A and B" will yield a different result. That's part of how I encountered bugs a few times.Also, Ashbad, your code works just the same as Code: [Select] If X=0 and (Y>5) or (Y=16) (You don't need the parentheses around the arguments to " and ")Note too that just because they are bitwise doesn't mean that you need parentheses. Those rules apply for any infix (taking arguments like "ArgA OPERATION ArgB") operator, and probably others. What you said is just a direct effect of Axe's utter lack of order of operations Also, after someone else posts another feature request, if we want to talk about this more could we do it in another thread? Otherwise it makes it a bit hard to see feature requests 468
Miscellaneous / Re: Latin thread« on: April 22, 2011, 08:20:03 pm »
Goplat: Latin is far, far worse for Google Translate.
Take, for example, the pair of sentences Quote from: Latin haec feci quia poteram Quote from: English I did these things because I couldThese mean the same thing. Asking Google Translate to take Latin to English gives this: Quote I could have done, because these thingsAnd from the original English to Latin: Quote feci haec quod potuiWhich translates correctly back to English (though it originally had "propter" for "quod", which is wrong grammatically.) So, using it to understand Latin fails, and you need some knowledge of Latin to get it to work in the other direction. Quisquamne hic est qui Latine scribere possit? 469
Miscellaneous / Re: Latin thread« on: April 22, 2011, 12:51:32 am »
Note to others: don't use Google Translate for Latin; it's horrendous.
yunhua: fail This is supposed to be serious, mind you, as evidenced by it's placement in miscellaneous, not spam 470
Miscellaneous / Re: Latin thread« on: April 20, 2011, 10:35:39 pm »
Different things work best for different people. My teacher likes to recommend flashcards, which help a lot of people. There are lots of other techniques. You can associate a word with a similar-meaning derivative, for example.
471
The Axe Parser Project / Re: Features Wishlist« on: April 20, 2011, 10:30:27 pm »
Here, screenshot, just because:
472
Miscellaneous / Re: Latin thread« on: April 20, 2011, 10:25:58 pm »
Well, the only two main parts are grammar and vocabulary. Being "fluent" to some extent is also rather difficult.
473
The Axe Parser Project / Re: Features Wishlist« on: April 20, 2011, 10:24:25 pm »
Those are definitely bitwise. For example, "1 and 2" returns 0, though, if it were logical, it would return 1.
This happened to be the source of several bugs in some of my Axe programs, mind you 474
Miscellaneous / Re: Mr. Hott« on: April 20, 2011, 10:22:57 pm »
Oh my
Too bad. Also, in what sort of band class do you do nothing? 475
Miscellaneous / Latin thread« on: April 20, 2011, 10:19:23 pm »
Hic Latine loquamur! (aut Anglice loqui tibi licet si non potes )
Quaere omnia quae de Latina lingua cognoscere velis. Here let us speak Latin! (or you are permitted to speak in English if you are not able ) Ask all things which you wish to learn about the Latin language. 476
Miscellaneous / Re: Latin 1« on: April 20, 2011, 10:03:22 pm »
Ah, that's what you meant. Silly me
We used Jenney's First Year Latin for years I-IV () and in IV we also use some book for Ovid's Metamorphoses. Edit: I'll just create a new topic, the old one's in Spam and I don't want to move it. 477
Miscellaneous / Re: Latin 1« on: April 20, 2011, 10:00:40 pm »
I'm taking it as a regular, not-online class. Not sure if you meant anything else.
Now to bump the thread! 478
OmnomIRC Development / Re: @+ in nicks« on: April 20, 2011, 09:58:08 pm »
It seems to be back
Edit: nope, sorry For some reason it does appear for actions (/me), though. 479
The Axe Parser Project / Re: Features Wishlist« on: April 20, 2011, 09:55:53 pm »
That's what " and ", " or ", and " xor " are for
480
Miscellaneous / Re: Latin 1« on: April 20, 2011, 09:54:30 pm »
I'm taking Latin IV right now, so obviously I don't think it's evil
The hardest part of any language is acquiring a sizable vocabulary. Learning any language is also, like above, a lot of work, so don't get upset if your first experience is awful Good luck! Also, I'll bump a Latin-language thread that's rather old for anyone interested in the language or writing in it. |
|