This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - calcdude84se
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 161
61
« on: April 03, 2012, 07:11:41 pm »
Very nice! An interesting question is if it, like the 84+ Pocket, is unable to swap RAM into $4000-$7FFF via port $06. Unfortunately, I think that would be a yes. Can you test that? (It's pretty simple; I or various others could tell you how.) I take it that it has boot code version 1.03 and the OS is 2.55MP?
62
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:23:38 pm »
Keoni, it is. We have an arcade, and the forums provide "social media"-type functions
63
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:22:23 pm »
AsmPrgm allows you to enter machine code (in hex form) via the BASIC editor. It can't be used to include machine code in a BASIC program--you can only use it to enter an assembly program. That being the case, it would make much more sense just to use ASM programs rather than enter them in manually. At that point, you're just using external ASM programs to do what BASIC cannot, and that's the purpose of the likes of Celtic and xLib. If you don't want to use hybrid BASIC, then someone, I guess, could write the subroutine programs. (Or someone could point you to ones that already exist. They probably do, but I don't know about them.)
64
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:23:30 pm »
At my school the categories are discussion forum and games. Cemetech and UTI aren't blocked, however, nor are various game sites.
65
« on: March 28, 2012, 10:12:09 pm »
I think he means the number of times SPL (Is that it? I mean the instruction used to "fork".) can be executed successfully.
66
« on: March 28, 2012, 05:21:58 pm »
Wowow wait. The modulus is not the remainder. It often is, but not when negative numbers are involved. The modulus has the sign of the divisor, the remainder has the sign of the dividend.
The given formula works for that. To use the example in Xeda's most recent post: In -1 mod 5, -1 is the dividend and 5 the divisor. Then, -1 mod 5 = -1 - floor(-1/5)*5 = -1 - (-1)*5 = -1 - -5 = -1 + 5 = 4. But the use of the word "remainder" in the quoted explanation is somewhat misleading, yes. As most of the time people are working with positive numbers, though, it's not that bad.
67
« on: March 25, 2012, 11:57:09 am »
yeah, basically just add a ret after each of the ld cmds, but make sure to use call instead of jp.
In this case that wouldn't work because he doesn't want to return back to where he was, but rather jump to Conditional. stevon8ter: your code, as it stands, converts keypresses to values, and uses those values to determine what code to execute. In this case, it would make much more sense just to use the keypresses directly to determine where to jump to execute the other code. (That is, Numb1 etc. and Conditional are unnecessary. IsSeven etc. should be jumped to directly from GetKeyLoop.)
68
« on: March 23, 2012, 12:49:23 pm »
When the processor jumps to Numb1, Numb3, or Numb7, it will load A with the appropriate number, but it will continue, not only to the next LD (if there is one), but also past the end of the program. At that point, it's no longer your code that's executing, and the processor's going to encounter something that leads it to crash.
69
« on: March 21, 2012, 08:35:31 pm »
First, make sure it's not just disabled. If you see "Toggle" on the far right not far under OmnomIRC, try clicking that. Also, try http://omnomirc.www.omnimaga.org/, which is OmnomIRC directly, without Omnimaga. Finally, try another browser if possible (and tell us what browser you're using currently).
70
« on: March 20, 2012, 09:57:14 pm »
Copy(Y1,L1+15,672) will copy 672 bytes from Y1 to L1. Under normal cases, this means that {Y1+X} will now equal {L1+X} for any X between 0 and 671. What I think you are afraid that that code might do would be expressed by Copy(Y1,{L1+15}r,672)
71
« on: March 19, 2012, 05:06:24 pm »
Is there any reason against using letters or other characters for Fix codes?
72
« on: March 13, 2012, 09:56:21 pm »
Looks very nice. I'll have to try it. Just looking at the README, I think you meant to mention addressing concerning both A and B, not A twice. Are indirect, indirect predecrement, and indirect postincrement for B /, <, and >, respectively?
73
« on: January 03, 2012, 07:37:58 pm »
I wonder if we could get official word from TI about this. If, as it seems, the 83+ is being phased out, this is definitely news-worthy. If TI is phasing it out everywhere, I feel sorry for Canada. (Maybe dropping the 83+ means they'll lower the price on the 84+(SE), though...)
75
« on: December 18, 2011, 08:52:17 pm »
More likely just misremembering. The closest statement to that that would be true is that X≤0 is only true if X is 0.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 161
|