This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - dinhotheone
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 28
211
« on: July 10, 2007, 10:45:00 am »
i hav, all eleven or so books, read em, enjoyed em and the movie was good too.
212
« on: July 10, 2007, 10:28:00 am »
what?!?! a little bit better. thats a massive understatement.
the plot of the LOTR movies were as close to the Eragon book as the eragon movie was to it. the movie was so far off its ridiculous. and no i dont think they're gona be doing eldest because number one: whoever made the movie should either be dead or in hiding and two they f'ed up all over the place. like 1/4 of book 2 is about eragon and arya. eragon loves her, and she can't love him back. but in the movie eragon, there is already mutual love. also the twins were not mentioned, but i guess you could get around them if its assumed that urgals would have regularly been able to overpower aizihad even though his entire honor guard was taken out by the twins in the book. also solembum's prophecy is never mentioned thouogh that will be more important in the third book. and i guess either the first half of book two would have to be skipped as arya already left the varden for ellesmera or that entire segment would have to be done without her even leaving them with no choise but to lie about how eragon enters ellesmera. also the Razac are dead, so the entire segment about roran would have to be made up not to mention that they will be playing a major part in book 3 also that merchant guy that is friends with brom, he was never seen so once again the entire roran segment of the second movie would end up being a big lie. over all, its either gona suck more than the first movie or it wont happen
the only part of the book the really nailed was the first ~3-5 minutes aka the prolouge. after that it seems they just toook the different parts of eragon and mixed em all up and that was the script. eg. saphira grows up in like minute 7, the herbalists prophesy haapens in the same town as eragon learns magic. it seems they also decided not to limit themselves by sticking to the book at all. spells are made up that give eragon xray vision and they decided to take some parts from eldest by having arya leave the varden.
comparing the book to the movie is worse than comparing the hitchhiker books to that movie, for all of you that have seen that.
this post was writen with a half hour of my time in the hopes that i am able to save 3 hours of yours (2.5 hours of movie, .5 hours of crying).
213
« on: July 10, 2007, 05:25:00 am »
good choise, besides its a one shot deal. they couldnt possibly make a second movie with all the s*** they left out (there arent any twins! for one) so your not gona be missing much. watching this movie also makes me very very sad.
214
« on: July 09, 2007, 06:43:00 pm »
idk what lucid dreaming is but i used to think about 4 dimensions each night. but now that soccer is over or at least not hard, i wouldnt be able to fall asleep if i didnt put all my efforts into it... i never said visualizing it was hard, halifax said its impossible and i disagreed.
edit: thats what lucid dreaming is? i dream like that whenever my room is below 67 degrees F. but usually when i am concious of my dreams they totally suck except for the ninja ones, those pwn. also they usually start to disapeer and im left lying in bed, cold.
215
« on: July 09, 2007, 11:35:00 am »
how can you speak of relativity, a theory based on 3 spacial dimensions and one time dimension and then in the next paragraph say light is the fourth. im fairly certain that seat is either reserved for the fourcth dimension of space-time or time. not light unless your gonna say that time is light...
also no, i dont know what that donut thing is...a link would be halpful as i dont see it online when i looked for it. does donut = string? string theory idk.
relative speeds isnt time travel. you dont hop in a ship and come out in the future. think of it like a skipping stone where the water is time. instead of being engulfed by water and time flowing naturally, you are only skimming it, only touching it for brief moments. you are not doing anything spectacular, just altering the way you observe time. whenever you are doing anyhting you are "traveling through time" equally as amazingly as traveling through time when your going at relative speeds.
also any spacial dimension runs perpendicular to the other spacial dimensions... also it is not impossible for humans to think in the fourth dimension. if a scientist said that then hes a tard as that is an unprovable hypothesis, a terrible scientist. also i knew someone who could so it. if you look up "David Brisson dimension" (i guess david brisson is also a canadian hockey player), who was my great uncle, you'll find plenty of references of n dimensional theory and perhaps you'll find that he claims to be able to visualize the fourth dimension. of course he can only claim to, because ppeople cant see into his head but thats why i am interested in n dimensional theory anway.
about that big advancement....i had already worked out all those things about the fourth dimension and more.
216
« on: July 09, 2007, 07:40:00 am »
have you played it? its very fun. i also hope it isnt canceled
217
« on: July 08, 2007, 06:47:00 pm »
im not sure what your saying, speed of life? is that like a philosophical theory of relativity? and i dont think that bending light slows it down, it just changes its trajectory. idk i really want to hear more about this but im fairly sure that quarks, at least last i knew, were discovered by exploding atoms (not like a bomb, just destorying em) and noting that something left a trail which they named that something quarks. so last i heard, quarks were never being handled, just observed. and the bending light thing doesnt really sound more real than the second, the second one only sounds like pseudo science, something that can never be proven. it all seems unbelivable but maybe if you find that link or w/e you could change my mind.
218
« on: July 08, 2007, 06:34:00 pm »
in a time when omnimaga is nearing desolation, one man desides to make a nasty looking game.
Ragol666 in ROL4
(^movie trailer voice^)
this looks really cool, and completely out of the blue. i cant wait to play this.
219
« on: July 06, 2007, 03:23:00 pm »
what do you guys think of me using the onboard sound card of the XFX MB-N68-ILT9 LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 680i LT SLI ATX Intel Motherboard? should i get a real one or go with this as sound isnt really too important to me?
220
« on: July 02, 2007, 01:40:00 pm »
yeah i said i found it. i realized that i was in the wrong thing when i saw you writing GT and i writing GTS. also im only getting 2gb so thats fine.
also a bit offtopic i hope you get a better ending in stalker than i did, since i always stole people's stuff, my ending involved getting rich and dieing, it was a terrible ending but i guess you can get a ton of em.
221
« on: July 02, 2007, 11:14:00 am »
i dont see this nasty deal on the 8600, can you send me a link. all i found was this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Description=eVGA+8600+GTS&x=0&y=0and neither are 99$. perhaps the deal is gone, the 7600 is going for 95 with rebate not 150 though. i looked at the corsair but the ratings weren't great, only 64% 5. or was i looking at the wrong thing (91 after rebate) i guess ill get it anyway as it IS cheaper and i trust you more than the ratings. and ya, the whole pirating thing and me commenting on stalker are connected. actually that and the new computer thing is connected as this crap heap wont run medieval 2. i had to use my moms comp for stalker but was kicked off for taking up like the 15 GB of mem it takes. as for my OS being illegal, microsoft "says its legit" so im not worried. lol vista was like 3 days out and they already were cracked. @netham is this #2 or #3? lol i wish i was that rich edit: nvm found it
222
« on: July 02, 2007, 08:26:00 am »
dame lotsaa people building comps this summer, heres mine:
XFX MB-N68-ILT9 LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 680i LT SLI ATX Intel Motherboard 189.99
Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 Conroe 2.13GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor 186.00
eVGA 256-P2-N554-AX Geforce 7600GT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 Video Card 115.99
MSI TurboStream 600W ATX 12V V2.2/ EPS 12V/ BTX 600W Power Supply $79.99
Kingston ValueRAM 1GB 24-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 533 (PC2 4200) Desktop Memory (*2) 94.98
ZEROtherm BTF90 92mm Silent UFO CPU Cooler $39.99
so about 707 dollars plus 50ish for shipping is $760ish. but what case would you guys suggest to fit all this stuff? i have no clue what would or wouldnt work for a case. spengo, you can get any OS for free if you know how. like my current xp pro. also i see you're playing stalker, a sick game if i say so myself.
223
« on: June 26, 2007, 04:39:00 pm »
i c all sorts of threads where guys are like "optimize my code :[code here]" and they say they pulled it form their latest basic project or w/e. my questing is how do you pull the code out of the prog. is there like some on comp basic writer that everyone except me knows about, or is there some simple way to do this that i dont know. unless you all type your code everytime, but i suck at typing.
224
« on: June 21, 2007, 01:42:00 pm »
yeah, i tried it, it was pretty cool, but i couldnt get past lvl 4 no matter what
225
« on: June 20, 2007, 08:31:00 am »
the new version doesnt seem to work with my 84+SE, idk why
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 28
|
Show Posts
