1726
Humour and Jokes / Re: Ever Wanted to Screw With IntelliSense? Here's How.
« on: August 07, 2010, 02:33:30 pm »
lol! Hopefully it wont happedn with tiDE
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1726
Humour and Jokes / Re: Ever Wanted to Screw With IntelliSense? Here's How.« on: August 07, 2010, 02:33:30 pm »
lol! Hopefully it wont happedn with tiDE
1727
[OTcalc] ARM-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 07, 2010, 02:29:12 pm »
That looks interesting, [propeller chip] but it is a competely different architecture, that almost essentially no one here is familiar with. We could have multiple low-performance chips, but it may get complicated. As for the gpu, I was thinking of something very basic, with the capabilities of say, the Super FX chip used in SNES games. It would be used for some sort of 3D-geometry program.
1728
[OTcalc] ARM-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 07, 2010, 01:53:32 pm »
I think specs like this is overkill. Also, battery drain is an issue. The non xm beagleboard uses 350ma @ 4.8v, so we would need some large batteries to keep it going for a while. I would aim for >20 hrs of battery life on 4 AA alkaline batteries.
As for the processor, I would say 200mhz at most, and a low power consumption one too. Feature-wise, we should definitely have a micro-usb port. Also, a 3.5 mm port for connecting to TI calcs and headphones. I'm a little iffy on a SD card slot. It seems a bit too much for a calculator. We might want a second gpu chip, that can do image scaling and rotating, and filling polygons. (For the 3d geometry, we'll say ) The screen should be 320x240, similar to the Nspire's, but have color. I think 4-bit rgb will be enough. (light and dark RGBCMY, black, white, and two shades of gray) 1729
[OTcalc] Z80-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 07, 2010, 01:10:58 pm »
It needn't be too high, because apparently an eZ80 is four times as efficient as a Z80 at the same clock speed. 20mhz should be sufficient.
Here's the user manual I got that from. 1730
[OTcalc] Z80-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 07, 2010, 12:57:56 pm »
We can have a 192x128 screen, so it scales perfectly.
1731
[OTcalc] Z80-Software / Re: KOS - OTz80« on: August 07, 2010, 12:56:00 pm »
I understand that, but if you read the first post, you'll see that development is done on TI calcs until there is a prototype.
1732
[OTcalc] Z80-Software / Re: KOS - OTz80« on: August 07, 2010, 12:45:45 pm »
If you want to help, you can also use an emulator to test, thus preventing srewing up your calc.
1733
[OTcalc] Z80-Software / Re: KOS - OTz80« on: August 07, 2010, 12:28:55 pm »
I don't know that much about z80 asm, but I would gladly test the software.
1734
[OTcalc] Z80-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 07, 2010, 11:27:42 am »
I think a qvga screen would be fine. The nspire has that resolution. However, if it makes the physical dimensions too big, we could go a smaller, maybe 192x128 or 240*160. With any screen, native graysacle is a must.
1735
Trapped for the TI-Nspire and TI-89 / Re: Trapped for TI-Nspire« on: August 07, 2010, 11:11:19 am »
@apcalc: for walking, you can use smooth scrolling and a 2 or 4 frame walking animation drawn in the same place on the screen.
1736
[OTcalc] Z80-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 07, 2010, 11:08:50 am »
The newer HP-50gs have sd card slots, so even though this is a calc, we shouldn't rule it out.
Also, what will the form factor be? 84 sized or Voyage 200? If it ends up being v200 sized we can always put a "DVORAK" keyboard, and still have it allowed on tests. 1737
OTcalc / Re: Let's build our own calculator!« on: August 06, 2010, 06:39:46 pm »
We could do it like the nspire: AA batteries and an optional rechargeable. There should also be an option to recharge AAs by plugging the thing in to a usb port.
1738
OTcalc / Re: Let's build our own calculator!« on: August 06, 2010, 05:18:20 pm »
I think we'll want something with lower specs than the beagleboard-I just took a look at the specs. Keep in mind this is a calculator.
1739
OTcalc / Re: Let's build our own calculator!« on: August 06, 2010, 04:59:17 pm »
This looks like a great project. I can't wait to see the results.
This topic has really exploded-158 posts in less than 24 hours. 1740
OTcalc / Re: Let's build our own calculator!« on: August 06, 2010, 11:08:08 am »
Keep in mind that Linux is programmed in C, so z80 isn't the best option. (compilers are not very good for z80)
|
|