This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - fb39ca4
Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67 68 ... 126
976
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:24:37 pm »
It has an FPU?
This is great! It will make writing 3d engines much faster.
977
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:22:27 pm »
I know my pace of development is glacial, but I definitely am not giving up on the project - at least not before custom WADs are supported, the strange crashing bugs fixed, and Clickpad controls improved. Maybe with the exception of the strange random crashes, all those should be fairly easy to implement... I'll just need to find the time, since I've got ridiculous amounts of work, and non-calculator activities take up time as well (heresy, I know ^_^).
Blasphem Nah, for something this good we're willing to wait  Good luck!
Mrakoplaz: have a look at port 900B0028 for the ON key.
Wow, I didn't realize there were that many ports on an Nspire  Or at least that big of a number.
Well, it has a 32 bit address space, (Think 4GB) and naturally, much of it is unused. The high numbers are just for readability and room for expansion with new hardware versions.
978
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:20:19 pm »
It has HD Graphics, unlike the Wii...
I don't think it has over 640x480 (maybe 320x240?) pixels (unless you count every pixel twice due to the 3D... but it wouldn't be HD even then)
For example, a lot of NES RPGs are absent from the GBC, and for the GBA the sound quality for many game ports is crappy, not to mention I have yet to see classics such as Secret of Mana and Chrono Trigger for the GBA (although CT came out for the DS later).
My main problem with the GBA ports is the reduced screen size, and the ridiculously bright graphics in some games.
Weird I didn't see the bright graphics.
It's only present in a few games. Since the original GBA didn't have a backlight, they made everything too bright instead, making it look terrible on GBAs that have backlight.
I think its like 840 X 480 - total, the pixels per eye is half.
979
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:16:47 pm »
So you're trying to do the same as that guy who put his 89 in an 83 case...
I wonder If you could find a broken CAS calc on ebay...
What kind do you have - a clickpad or touchpad>
980
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:14:25 pm »
Happy birthday, JosJuice!
How old are you turning?
981
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:12:46 pm »
Lol!
Sometimes I wish menu items in programs were also mapped to number keys, like on calcs.
982
« on: March 24, 2011, 08:07:57 pm »
! IMO, teh 6990 is still a better buy, because it has a greater power efficiency, and if you're using opencl, you have like 5 teraflops versus about 3 for the 590. A couple months ago I was at best buy, and the most powerful card there was a GTX 460, but it was $75 overpriced compared to online. They also had some 5750s and the like for about $130 (Also way overpriced). Me, I'm never gonna have a top of the line product, just too pricey for me. (Unless you count the RIVA 128 in my 13year old and counting computer - back then it was the best  ) Also, neat coincidence it came out on my birthday 
983
« on: March 24, 2011, 06:43:14 am »
984
« on: March 23, 2011, 02:40:48 pm »
Looks nice, but the Prizm is sexier I remember someone did a hardware mod and basically put a whole gameboy color inside their calc. With the smaller size, this would be cool if it were done again. Edit: 3 (!) replies while I was typing.
985
« on: March 22, 2011, 05:17:27 pm »
1452: You copy this list onto your calc and read it from there.
986
« on: March 22, 2011, 05:03:23 pm »
1451: Your calc, a being much more compassionate than you, makes you stop harassing lobsters.
987
« on: March 21, 2011, 03:34:43 pm »
Apparently, IE9 can't render microsoft.com properly I get the same problem, so I'm guessing its just me. It might have to do with the GPU acceleration being used.
988
« on: March 21, 2011, 02:42:33 pm »
I just got a random slowdown running this page in firefox, but I think that was my internet connection Anyways, I realized I forgot to close IE, and when I did, everything looked normal. 
989
« on: March 21, 2011, 02:39:08 pm »
true. Maybe a lowercase b/h? or %/$?
I think %/$ would be a good idea. They're hardly used in other situations.
Unless we want to make them actual operators? 
EDIT: Btw, who's actually working on this?
% might be used as the modulus operator, like in C. @ could be used as well
990
« on: March 21, 2011, 02:36:30 pm »
1445: Your calculator programs you.
Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67 68 ... 126
|
Show Posts
