This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - jnesselr
Pages: 1 ... 71 72 [73] 74 75 ... 165
1081
« on: January 23, 2011, 03:30:59 pm »
Makes me want to work on TAO more. Someone, give me 12 of their 24 hours. ;-)
1082
« on: January 23, 2011, 03:30:20 pm »
*graphmastur, and glad I could help. ;-)
1083
« on: January 23, 2011, 02:03:15 pm »
On a side note I hope {AP} still moderates the image folder, though. It would suck if somebody started uploading pr0n and the like X.x
Unless of course, it was calc pr0n like KOS is. ;-) j/k.
1084
« on: January 23, 2011, 08:35:04 am »
That looks really awesome kerm!
1085
« on: January 22, 2011, 04:49:42 pm »
If this was accomplished, it would probably work for many different calcs as well, since the syntax is usually identical. One exception is the 85 and 86, since their commands are often shortened (outpt instead of output) and their menu function is very different as well (menu(position,name,lbl,position,name,label) whereas others are Menu(Title,Name,Lbl,name,lbl)) but otherwise very cross-compatible.
Ideally it would also be written in Java  then we might even get it on the nspire 
It has to be written in Java for the android, but I doubt it would be cross-compatible with the nspire.
1086
« on: January 22, 2011, 04:42:02 pm »
On a similar note though... would it be difficult you emulate all of the functions that a program could use such that we could emulate any Basic program without actually using any OS? It probably would be incredibly tedious, but we know how every works, so it would just be a matter of implementing it.
Probably, but side-effects of it would not be reproduced. You would have to make it work EXACTLY how it did in all instances of the command.
1087
« on: January 22, 2011, 11:34:35 am »
Awesome, it can be used as storage! Now if only Wabbit could run on the Prizm...
Thats what I thought this article was Even so, thats epicly awesome! Casio sure knows how to make a good file transfer unlike TI who are plain morons at it. *Roundhouse kicks Ti Connect*
Well, in all honesty, developing a device to act as a mass storage device is a lot harder than just saying vendor specific and winging it.
1088
« on: January 21, 2011, 11:05:44 pm »
Offtopic: anyone know what the image in {AP}'s sig is?
yes. http://ourl.ca/2782
1089
« on: January 21, 2011, 09:07:51 pm »
Does anyone know how to get the system time on an 84+? I know how to get the battery state and free ram and some other stuff (thanks to wikiti) but i dont know how to get the time. Im assuming it will require Asm(hex).
Yes, well it's kinda complicated. There are several ports that describe it. And yes, it will require asm( Look at this: http://wikiti.brandonw.net/index.php?title=83Plus:Ports:40
1090
« on: January 21, 2011, 08:33:05 pm »
If the emulators got the ROMs packaged into them, then distributing the emulators is pretty much illegal.
Pretty much. The only way possible around this is if an emulator can run from a .8xu perfectly, and have everything set up like the normal boot page would have it set up. (Are there any other pages I'm missing, or is boot page the only one?)
1091
« on: January 21, 2011, 07:39:51 am »
I like this project, it looks nice.
1092
« on: January 21, 2011, 07:37:53 am »
Which means that we could have a rom on the SD card. I couldn't seem to find the app to download. I also don't know enough of Android coding to start on this just yet.
1093
« on: January 21, 2011, 07:34:40 am »
What if drawing home screen text just involved changing a tiny portion of the screen memory, though? Could that be faster?
No, and we're not trying to change the "homescreen", we're trying to find where the ram is that the screen is mapped to. In the TI-83/84 series, the LCD has it's own ram, which is why it is so slow. Besides, writing this way would actually be faster because there are fewer sections because the memory is larger.
1094
« on: January 20, 2011, 10:43:25 pm »
K = [[5 93][17 53]]
M = [[13 11][ 19 17]]
That's correct. So I was basically an idiot. I was supposed to have it be "all but one" where prime for K. oh well nemo gets it.
1095
« on: January 20, 2011, 10:28:21 pm »
Matrix M is correct. The first column of Matrix K is correct.
Wow, Nemo just pointed out an obvious error. I meant to say all but ONE were prime. My bad.
Pages: 1 ... 71 72 [73] 74 75 ... 165
|
Show Posts
