I can turn lead into gold and replicate Matlab, but I can't make the sun shine (although I can accelerate it's growth into a black hole in a few months). The programmer's stone is in my project folder, but it's lacking some features.
I think we need to have a little talk about that black hole thing. Now, is that OUR sun, or some other galaxies?
grrr... I wanted to include a backup utility with this, but its failing.
My calc is one of the newer ones, so no pages 4-7. I would think pages 2 and 3 would work well enough though... but apparently not. The calc crashes when trying to parse BASIC with just a backup, and resets immediately upon return to ti-os with a backup and restore.
Scratch that, re-running the app after backup strangely prevents crashing, but the restore still fails.
Everything else mostly works. That'd be the backdoor that still fails.
Actually, 82 (ram page 2) should work. TIOS uses 80 and 81 (ram pages 0 and 1).
I'm sure it would be possible to setup SMF to detect iPods, but I don't know how and it might prevent future SMF upgrades, not to mention some people might prefer using the default forum view on their ipods.
Yeah, I always use the default theme. You could have it be based on the user itself, but that would require tons of mods.
Arrange your numbers in a matrix. The width determines the numbers you can eliminate. Here's the basic concept. The width is a multiple of several prime numbers. If you multiply 3,5,and 7 together you get 105. In the 105 columns, you can eliminate every 3rd starting at 3, every 5th starting at 5, and every 7th starting at 7. You don't need to put in two, since you can simply eliminate every other going down each column (-210 instead of -105)
The more primes you multiply in (nonprimes are useless, eliminate no more rows) the more you can eliminate! yay! Now for checkerboarding for multiples of 2:
1 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47 49 53 59
True, you eliminate two, but who cares? You don't lose any primes.
By the way, doing this exactly this way with 105 (0-104) give you 31.428% remaining, whereas 3 gives 33.333% It's exponentially less effective, but still waaay better than just -2.
Edited for better readability
Edit: Also, I find it worth noting that since the math involved in this is fairly simple, and not based on the size of the number, it is practical for use on RSA cracking
It actually does matter, because even if you had all the primes from 0 to n-1, it would still be just as difficult to search through them all. So, no, it doesn't help at all with RSA.
No, that label (and its call) had been there for a long, long time. I compiled, it worked fine. I added nothing besides sub(23)'s, not even a Lbl 23. I gto a MAX SYMBOLS error. Removing the sub(23)'s led to an error-free compile.
Well, then the compiler probably saw that and said "oh, I should add a label entry for that. We'll figure out where it is in pass 2"
I wanted to finish the tiles I needed for the first map of Starcraft: Zeratul, so now I am working on "Map Mode" for Correlation. Progress screenshot coming soon!
Show Posts
