This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - jnesselr
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 165
706
« on: March 07, 2011, 07:20:26 pm »
Just an idea that I was talking to you about in IRC. If say page 6 is a FAT table (starts with 0xF0), and page 5 has a file that starts with the byte 0xF0, then you get problems. I suggest something like 0xF1 or something at least to show you that it is FST. (Actually, I would do 0xF1 for the FAT and 0xF0 for FST)
707
« on: March 07, 2011, 07:14:38 pm »
Sweet, if I get stage tech next year I might try it!
I have stage tech now, and want to try it. Alas, our light board is a bit more complicated than what a calc can drive.
708
« on: March 07, 2011, 06:57:21 pm »
^ Yes, that's another way. The only problem is that MyFunction isn't your constructor, and so anyone outside the class that tried to insatiate it might not call MyFunction();
i just copy/pasted scout's code. i'm not sure if he wanted the class to be MyFunction (shouldn't it be MyClass, then?) or if he wanted MyFunction to be a method, which i thought made more sense because a method is essentially a function
it doesn't have to have class in it at all. If he wanted the class to be MyFunction, he should call it MyFunction, not MyClass. a method is a function, yes. But in this case it would be a method of the instance variable. e.g.:
myToUpperCaseFunction.MyFunction();
yes, that's what i was aiming for. i just realized MyFunction isn't static so my code won't compile, but regardless if i saw a class called MyFunction i would be confused.
True, which is why you name it after what it does. not just MyFunction. More like MyUberAwesomeReallyLongThisHasNoSpacesAndIsAPainToInitiateClass. ;-)
709
« on: March 07, 2011, 06:53:35 pm »
^ Yes, that's another way. The only problem is that MyFunction isn't your constructor, and so anyone outside the class that tried to insatiate it might not call MyFunction();
i just copy/pasted scout's code. i'm not sure if he wanted the class to be MyFunction (shouldn't it be MyClass, then?) or if he wanted MyFunction to be a method, which i thought made more sense because a method is essentially a function
it doesn't have to have class in it at all. If he wanted the class to be MyFunction, he should call it MyFunction, not MyClass. a method is a function, yes. But in this case it would be a method of the instance variable. e.g.: myToUpperCaseFunction.MyFunction();
710
« on: March 07, 2011, 06:38:46 pm »
^ Yes, that's another way. The only problem is that MyFunction isn't your constructor, and so anyone outside the class that tried to insatiate it might not call MyFunction();
711
« on: March 07, 2011, 06:11:33 pm »
What asm lib are you using? USB8x?
712
« on: March 07, 2011, 05:51:56 pm »
Of course that won't work. Because MyFunction needs to be a class. What you need is this:
public class MyFunction {
public static void main(String[] args)
{
MyFunction myToUpperCaseFunction = new MyFunction(); // Create a new instance of this class called MyFunction. I.E. calls the constructer.
}
public MyFunction() { // This is what is called when you call the "constructer" with no arguments. (Nothing inside the parenthesis) Notice that there is no return type, as you are creating and returning an "instance" of the object MyFunction.
System.out.println("Object initiated");
}
}
713
« on: March 07, 2011, 08:02:01 am »
I'm at least glad to see all these projects on the list, for the fact it means they're not dead. I hope they get completed eventually. 
Oh, these were supposed to be non-dead projects... j/k
714
« on: March 07, 2011, 07:56:56 am »
Way to ruin my point.
J/k 
Also, KFS 2.0 is coming along great, once I finish the spec, I'll post it and implement it. The first section talks about the structure and implementation, and isn't specific to KnightOS (feel free to use KFS in your own OS project). The second part explains how it pertains to KOS.
It would actually be bets if everyone uses the same file structure, IMHO.
715
« on: March 06, 2011, 07:31:56 pm »
For the record, I don't have a prizm, because I'm saving for an ubercalc, but I still can hack, do usb stuff and program on the computer.
716
« on: March 06, 2011, 07:10:53 pm »
orly? it should show up... I wonder why it didn't.
you sir, deserve a gold star for bug exploiting.
So do I get an "official" gold star?
717
« on: March 06, 2011, 06:25:19 pm »
you sir... you deserve a gold star.
It doesn't seem to show up, but I followed the address and saw it.
718
« on: March 06, 2011, 06:20:51 pm »
Yeah, it was funny with the bot party we had. But it's not really a bot channel, just a discussion thing.
719
« on: March 06, 2011, 06:19:58 pm »
so, you get a bonus since you were an early supporter through kickstart, and if enough money isn't raised you get your cash back? interesting. seems much less risky than I first thought!
Also, a suggestion that would make this project a LOT cheaper, faster and easier, but would be difficult to pull off (but soooo worth it) find a case that fits your needs and is already heavily produced.
I disagree with that. Yes, it's cheeper, but a calc is distinguished by it's case and looks. Anyway, it's not really a bonus per-se, but whoever the kickstarter project owner is can give you rewards. For example, you could make only contributions that give $150 or more actually get the calc. ($200 gets your name put into the bootcode so it can't be erased)
720
« on: March 06, 2011, 05:40:08 pm »
TAO: Unleashed - Oh, where's the time....
prizmsuite - in the works, not much is done yet.
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 165
|
Show Posts