1
oh thank you, I'll try it as soon as possible !
It's great to see Punix on the Levenez Unix History page!
It's great to see Punix on the Levenez Unix History page!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Quote Regarding your LinuxFR article: I know I mentioned in my Punix blog that I am trying to make a speech synthesizer, but I didn't mean that it's going to be part of Punix itself. It's just going to be a program that will run under Punix (or under TI-AMS if someone wants to port it). Ok, I think many will understand (I have not written more, my article was already long!), and then, usually, when we speak about a BSD distro, we talk about the kernel and userland I admit to not having thought we might think it would be in the kernel. I guess when the filesystem is operational, some Unix tools will not be hardcoded into the kernel (init, sh...) but they are part of your "punix" project Also, I wrote something like "Some improvements are more likely to occur than others", I think no one will blame if it is not in the kernel Thank you for reading my article, I hope that machine translation was not too hard to read (but it's probably better than my poor english) Do you know what would be incompatible with the HW1? Grayscale, sure, maybe the sound due to the 68k running at 10mhz, but there is something else? 3
You say in your readme that we need to download flashos.a to build punix, but GCC4Ti included it for some time ( http://trac.godzil.net/gcc4ti/ticket/11 ), and I successfully built punix without download it separately.
Also, I've successfully compiled the beta4 for V200 with GNU/Linux, by changing the MAKE variable to make (instead of gmake) in the Makefile (gmake is the name of gnu make on BSD, I'm not running BSD ), then adding some V200 preprocessor instructions to the source : http://pastebin.com/eBxnEBk5 I've not tested it on my real V200, only on TiEmu, but support the V200 should not be too difficult, I do not think it is so different from the TI92 + (probably less than between the TI89 and Titanium)
Pages: [1]
|
|