This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - kalan_vod
Pages: 1 ... 62 63 [64] 65 66 ... 194
946
« on: August 22, 2006, 06:29:00 pm »
QuoteBegin-Sultan+22 Aug, 2006, 16:56--> QUOTE (Sultan @ 22 Aug, 2006, 16:56) | Ok now you are all creeping me out... |
It is in his sig, he just like bunnys~!
947
« on: August 22, 2006, 06:28:00 pm »
Just set this on hold, and work on a side project. It has come such a long way, and it is getting better each update!
948
« on: August 22, 2006, 01:28:00 am »
QuoteBegin-lolje+22 Aug, 2006, 4:51--> QUOTE (lolje @ 22 Aug, 2006, 4:51) | All right but what's the size of the matrix compared to the string-size when you use 2- or even 3,4,5-digit numbers? Would the string still be so much smaler? |
It will make the string bigger, but the matrix would remain the same size.
949
« on: August 21, 2006, 06:33:00 pm »
QuoteBegin-threefingeredguy+22 Aug, 2006, 0:24--> QUOTE (threefingeredguy @ 22 Aug, 2006, 0:24) | Um, Kevin, 767+12 = 779. xLIB includes the bottom row, remember? The bottom row is 12 bytes. |
:paf:
950
« on: August 21, 2006, 06:33:00 pm »
QuoteBegin-threefingeredguy+22 Aug, 2006, 0:22--> QUOTE (threefingeredguy @ 22 Aug, 2006, 0:22) | QuoteBegin-kalan_vod+21 Aug, 2006, 21:18-->QUOTE (kalan_vod @ 21 Aug, 2006, 21:18) | Well, you are saying it is smaller once stored, which is correct ([A] being 14411 and str1 being 3332 as you said). But when it is sitting inside a program it is the same size as it being: c1-->CODE | ec1:"[[1,1,1][1,0,1][1,1,1]] is more bytes than :[[1,1,1][1,0,1][1,1,1c2 |
ec2 So, basiclly once you have it in a program it is around the same size. But then you add your changing of str1 into Y1 and now into [A], which is adding to the size of the program and lessing the speed (not much at all, but adding ms). I am sorry if this doesn't make sense. |
True, but when stored in memory, like in ANS/[A]/whatever, the string version is ~10 times smaller.
|
Yes, this is the conclusion we came to .
951
« on: August 21, 2006, 03:26:00 pm »
Ok, well that makes this more practical. I guess I took it differently with the title, but I guess it is good that we had this discussion so that others know what this is meant for .
952
« on: August 21, 2006, 03:21:00 pm »
Ok, but most people have the matrixs (the levels) stored inside a program.
953
« on: August 21, 2006, 03:18:00 pm »
Well, you are saying it is smaller once stored, which is correct ([A] being 14411 and str1 being 3332 as you said). But when it is sitting inside a program it is the same size as it being: c1--> CODE | ec1:"[[1,1,1][1,0,1][1,1,1]] is more bytes than :[[1,1,1][1,0,1][1,1,1c2 |
ec2 So, basiclly once you have it in a program it is around the same size. But then you add your changing of str1 into Y1 and now into [A], which is adding to the size of the program and lessing the speed (not much at all, but adding ms). I am sorry if this doesn't make sense.
954
« on: August 21, 2006, 03:08:00 pm »
QuoteBegin-Killerplayer+21 Aug, 2006, 21:07--> QUOTE (Killerplayer @ 21 Aug, 2006, 21:07) | No I don't understand what you are saying.
QUOTE | This may not be a compressor routine wise |
I know it's not a compressor
|
I meant this isn't forming a compression, you said it was a decompressor.
955
« on: August 21, 2006, 02:58:00 pm »
Not to be mean but this isn't really compressing, in the program you are taking up more space than the orig. matrix. When you compare the stored byte value of str1 and [A], they are two types of data formats. In a program if you store [A] into [A] it will be less bytes and faster than what you have suggested. Hope this explains it for you.
956
« on: August 21, 2006, 02:24:00 pm »
Looks like free movement wins!
957
« on: August 21, 2006, 12:51:00 pm »
THE POST 8666083 THE POST
958
« on: August 21, 2006, 12:25:00 pm »
I like the names, but "Wysheid" reminds me of "Windshield"
959
« on: August 21, 2006, 12:24:00 pm »
Looks really nice, and I love the way you bolded the important stuff!
960
« on: August 21, 2006, 12:22:00 pm »
QuoteBegin-xlibman+21 Aug, 2006, 15:56--> QUOTE (xlibman @ 21 Aug, 2006, 15:56) | i swear there was one in his post, I guess it got screwed up when splitting the topic |
I figured.
Pages: 1 ... 62 63 [64] 65 66 ... 194
|