This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - kyllopardiun
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 13
121
« on: October 18, 2010, 09:25:40 pm »
No!!! :O
EDIT: Of coure I tried
You tried? I thought noone would do this, sorry...
122
« on: October 18, 2010, 09:15:30 pm »
If you still want to know what I.L. is than copy this code below paste in your address bar,
and then press enter.
javascript:for(;;){alert("%49%20%73%68%6F%75%6C%64%6E%27%74%20%68%61%76%65%20%64%6F%6E%65%20%73%75%63%68%20%74%68%69%6E%67%21");}void(0)
123
« on: October 18, 2010, 08:34:19 pm »
true. but there a lot less linux users too. So, hasvanyone thought about rsa much?
Since my table ideas wasn't good, there's just another thing in my mind that sounds plausible to get the RSA keys, and it's 5.9 however, I don't think we should go that far...
124
« on: October 18, 2010, 12:46:13 pm »
And it's an App. Apps don't use any shell.
TI-Boy doesn't work because the nspire emulates the 84+ in a very weird (and fairly inaccurate) way, and some functions that TI doesn't think exist (AKA Undocumented functions) don't work. TI-Boy needs these functions to work.
MirageOS doesn't work for the same reason, but brandonw made a patch program called MOSPatch that fixes it. TI-Boy cannot be fixed in this manner.
Other Asm progs can be run in Doors CS, MirageOS or even from the homescreen! (Catalog, Asm(prgmASMPROG))
Hope that helps.
Thanks Willrandship, it was very helpful to understand why some programs do run in asm while others don't.
125
« on: October 18, 2010, 10:49:55 am »
You need the Ti 84 keypad for MirageOS, but I reccomend DoorsCS as it is fully compatible with Nspires.
Is it possible to run asm programs (e.g. TI-Boy SE) in in a Nspire with DoorsCS 7.0?
126
« on: October 18, 2010, 06:52:21 am »
Lol never heard the Ruindows thing before, but in English it almost fits the OS perfectly  . People usually just say Winblows, Window$ and French people say Windaube. 
Ruim in portuguese: bad/poor, but now, I thought about it and you are right. I think it does fit better in english than in portuguese.. 
127
« on: October 17, 2010, 04:05:24 pm »
Oh, he writes in BASIC? That's not even a real language 
Well, isn't many options for nspire than basic... and there is a lot of workaround using spreadsheets, [these are why it's possible to do 3d graphs in nspire] The difference is graph3 was written in asm, and 3d plot and nspir3D was written in basic.
I thought asm programs wouldn't run in the emulator... as a lot of programs for 84 which are in asm can't run on it
128
« on: October 17, 2010, 12:44:56 pm »
Sorry if I was unclear, this is just the keypad, not the rest of the calc.
Ok, I thought you really was able to buy the calc for that unbelievable price... I would pay up to 20$ for a clickpad.
The ti 84 plus keyboard is free in portugal
Well, normally it's free only for the clickpad...
129
« on: October 17, 2010, 12:28:35 pm »
If you're fine with your calc looking weird, you could buy the clickpad from TI ($10), and then use OS 1.1.
$10? I would buy one for that price...
130
« on: October 17, 2010, 12:18:36 pm »
I thought the rainbow crack was for windows passwords...
It was made for crack MD5, then they started to include other keys like LM, NTLM, SHA1, MYSQLSHA1, HALFLMCHALL, NTLMCHALL, ORACLE-SYSTEM, MD5-HALF but, nothing for RSA yet. And it run in both linux and Ruindows <- (inside joke) just can speak portuguese will understand...
131
« on: October 17, 2010, 11:25:13 am »
Cool thank you for the info. I did not use OS 2.x and above a lot (the only OSes to have Request) so I wasn't too sure. Most of the time my TI-Nspire is in 84 mode and when it isn't I use OS 1.1.
Now I got, why it don't work in my calc ... This is so far the first advantage of 2.x that I know up to know. And I will keep my trusty 1.7
132
« on: October 17, 2010, 11:14:27 am »
sorry for not have seen the other topic before... No argument there
I was just explaining him that distributed computing probably wouldn't help enough for the factorization to become practical, with the current algorithms 
Actually, rainbow crack //I don't know how much you know about it, but isn't for RSA keys, my suggestion was something like it, not it, maybe I should say it more explicit... And I said it because I like to divide in tables for giving each one a part to do, as I like also the style of these tables. But, it can't be used as it is for factoring a RSA key. =/ With current algorithms, it would require so much Time and computational power that it wouldn't be feasible. That is why I like recursive algorithms that run in log n time. ;-)
Are you sure that isn't any recursive algorithm? That's sad after so many time none came yet. but, sometimes when using some recursive functions in c I see that computer many times will do much more quickly than a n function, but, it will crash before the end. //I tried this, exactly with a friend to see which program in c was faster, both used pointers, but mine had a little more of it and was recursive. mine was pretty quickly at start and then crashed at some number. while his took sometime to achieve that number, but after it done it continued to next numbers.
133
« on: October 17, 2010, 12:19:27 am »
Not to be rude, but I honestly don't think Nelson Souna's documents are that great. I can't say I have tried all of them, but for most of them that I have tried, I have not been too impressed. For example, the Periodic Table document is very hard to use as compared to the one on the 84 or TI-89 periodic tables. It takes me a good, solid minute to scroll to a specific element using the clickpad/touchpad because I can never line the cursor up with the corner of the element square. This is a task that would take seconds if the table was in ASM and the arrow keys were used to move between the elements.
The only document the Nelson Souna has written that is on my calculator is the Chemistry Library, which I must add is incomplete. I added many functions to it to make it more useful (which I can't use now since I downgraded my OS  ).
Actually, there is just few files from him that I use: with the 2 first been impressive for me. Nspir3D Chemistry Library Systems of Equations and Equations of 2nd Degree Constants and Unit Conversion Yeah I remember that. It's quite sad. Fortunately he doesn't do that very often, though, and only does it on TI-Nspire Google Group, so we're kinda fine. I just kinda wish people would recognize the hard work it takes to write certain programs. Maybe his files are good, but Calc84maniac stuff is also very good. Just because they're calc games or emulators don't make them bad.
EDIT: Even for me who is a noob when we are talking about calc programming, I think programs in asm in general are greater then the same programs using basic language, both for complexity, and speed. I can't really understand why someone would be against 3rd party programming. Okay, you can not like it and see it as a waste of time. That's fine. But to feel that no one should be able to program? Plus, some programs take a hell of a lot of math to write. You ARE dealing with a machine that only accepts numbers as input. Playing around with it is almost as good as a math book sometimes.
I think he's just a lost guy look: ¤ he is against our community ¤ he say people here aren't creative and don't do anything original while he wrote a dumb pacman, when a port of the real pacman, would be greater
134
« on: October 16, 2010, 11:36:45 pm »
Wasn't it something like Request() and RequestStr()? I'm not sure anymore.
Its: Request "x",a
Or for Strings: RequestStr "x",a
x is the message which is displayed
a is the name of the new variable which is given a value
up to now I've seen strings only in the function/prgm("hereismystring1","hereismystring2",...)
but not in the middle of the program to get strings...
You can use it par example like this
...
RequestStr "Name",name
...
Text "As the dusk arrived you heard someone shout"&name&",irritated you turned around..."
...
hope this doesn't sound to educational
Nice to know about it (=
135
« on: October 16, 2010, 10:00:26 pm »
"asm? asm is useless educational-wise and programming-wise"
I cant find the original quotes but that was the general idea
My guess is he said that because he is afraid of programming in asm, so he goes and try to show everybody how great is the basic language... he may do some miracles, but still not great as what someone could do in C, or ASM for example.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 13
|
Show Posts
