256
Humour and Jokes / Re: The scariest computer ever.
« on: August 15, 2010, 08:06:02 am »
Whity
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 258
[OTcalc] ARM-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 14, 2010, 06:30:13 pm »
Low price is a must really. I agree with Dj and bobjr and program4 on that. We need a good marketing strategy as well but that is of later worry. Forunately I nearly have a degree in economics
![]() 259
OmnomIRC Development / Re: OmnomIRC Focus« on: August 14, 2010, 06:27:13 pm »
If I may suggested another addition to the IRC, it would be handy to have more then one-line of text. It's not a must but it would be nice.
Good fix, helps me out too! 260
[OTcalc] Z80-Hardware / Re: eZ80 Hardware Discussion« on: August 14, 2010, 01:07:21 pm »
@alberthrocks
I don't think we should close down this topic. We only have decied on the processor! I think we need to decide on the LCD, LCD driver,RAM, ROM, IO ports etc! Those are still undecided on, as you can see here: http://otcalc.wikidot.com/z80-hardware. So i suggest we settle those first. 261
[OTcalc] ARM-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 14, 2010, 12:10:03 pm »Well, versatility and a certain level of computing power are also goals.True but you can do alot with 100-200 MHZ. ![]() 262
TI Z80 / Re: Star Fox« on: August 14, 2010, 12:00:58 pm »
You are both Impossibly good at spriting!
great work ThePenguin! I can't wait for more! 263
TI Z80 / Re: Star Fox« on: August 12, 2010, 02:58:24 pm »I'm not exactly sure how many it can handle. Space wise, it could do in the thousands. But as far as speed, I would imagine at 7 or 8 tiles of 4 polygons each you would notice slow downs. But I haven't tried it yet.Thanks for the info. Sorry if I offend you by what I am going to say next but couldn't you better use dithering instead of grayscale and let it take up the whole screen? Altough a clear side effect would be that you can't have custom sized sprites...(well you can but it's slightly slower I guess). Don't get me wrong. I like greyscale, I was just wondering if it would be practical/faster. 264
[OTcalc] Z80-Hardware / Re: eZ80 Hardware Discussion« on: August 12, 2010, 10:55:06 am »The OP "registers" are actually six 9-byte (?) memory areas in RAM, and are specific to the TI-OS.I think it was far more then that...I recall about 2-4K in total...I might be mistaken tho. Well then I suggest adding a very small superfast ram for varaibles. 265
[OTcalc] Z80-Software / Re: OT Basic« on: August 12, 2010, 10:03:36 am »You sorta reminded me of the never-used OpenLib( and ExecLib( commands on the 84+(SE).I believe there attemtps/plans at making a FAT like filesystem but I can't tell for sure. Would be great though. I never really understood OpenLib() and ExecLib(). 266
[OTcalc] Z80-Hardware / Re: eZ80 Hardware Discussion« on: August 12, 2010, 09:52:53 am »
I suggest we use the OP registers for variables? Since OTBasic vars are going to be prefix it has to be a quite a static (with that I mean that different varaibles have a fixed lenght. Especially the small ones like bool, byte, short and even int) buffer. And it has to have fast reading and writing. I think the OP's are perfect for this. Does anybody know how much memory in total the OP buffers supply?
267
[OTcalc] Z80-Software / Re: OT Basic« on: August 12, 2010, 09:43:25 am »Sounds good.Exactly. Whenever you do something like: UseLib([LibName]) it knows it has to send/include the library as well. I like the central libraries Idea alot. Just like you had apps on the original TI-8x you can now have a same sort of place for packages and libraries. That would be pretty awesome ![]() 268
TI Z80 / Re: Star Fox« on: August 12, 2010, 08:38:46 am »
Looks very good! How many poly's/quad's can it handle? And I suppose there is no lighting (would be a overkill i think)?
Anyway, great job on this so far! 269
[OTcalc] ARM-Hardware / Re: Hardware Discussion« on: August 11, 2010, 09:12:57 pm »This is getting away from being a calculator, and more towards a portable media device. Also, realize that the beagleboard is for prototyping, and testing software. A calculator does not need a 1ghz cpu. We will need to keep the cost down, to at least under $150, otherwise no one will buy it.I agree. How about a fifth of that speed? 200Mhz? 270
[OTcalc] Z80-Software / Re: OT Basic« on: August 11, 2010, 09:05:13 pm »
I had an Idea for merging this Basic language with the harder language I proposed. Add-ons is the keyword. I'd like to see libraries and packages included which I define as follows
The use of a SDK or library is to add aditional functionality that wasn't available in the bare-bone version of OTBasic which is by default included in the OS. Now any PACKAGE completely overwrites the Oncalc-editor and the tokens/commands and replaces it with the Default Bare-Bone commands + the added commands. A LIBRARY is a seperate file that can be included in the Prgram itself using something like: "UseLib([libname])" This adds tokens without overwriting the Bare-Bone editor. The side-effect is that a external file (the Library) is needed. So basically you can use new commands when adding a library. When adding a package you can simply pack multiple libraries into on file which itself is inherit to the OS. So shortly said: a library adds one external file, a package adds multiple libraries but doesn't make a external file. It becomes a part of the editor as if it was already rpogrammed with these extra commands. I hope I don't confuse anyone with this IDEA. It's just a suggestion. |
|