Good luck on your projects and hope the book turns out how you want

Thanks. I still need to mess with a few other designs too

Cursor snapping can't be to hard to implement, I imagine. I mean you'd basically have your scrolling code and then when if you go over the barrier it just subtracts that many spots, or at least that's how I would do it in TI-BASIC.

Well I think I'm just gonna put my two cents in.

I feel like the idea of wrap around is a little taboo in Minesweeper. I just think it will mess with people who go in expecting to play a normal Minesweeper game but then when a number on the edge says four but they can only find two touching ones, it might mess with them and think the game is flawed. Even if you put it in a Readme.txt file there is no guarantee people will read it. Also the wrap around expansion is a little odd too because that would be completely new and odd to some people. Like I know for a fact those would mess with me unless I really focused and remembered those things.

As for what you were calling map looping. I like this idea, though not in the context you were saying. I think you should be able to scroll out to the end of the map and then when you go one more over it wraps back to the first row/column.

1234  1234
123X  X234
1234  1234
1234  1234
That's what I mean. It'll be odd if you do:

1234  2341
123X  234X
1234  2341
1234  2341
I could be wrong, but that's what it sounded like you were saying.

What ever you do though I think it'll be great. This has been an amazing project so far Keep up the good work and can't wait to see progress

Ya, we need someone who fully understands the glitch to explain it to everyone.

Ya, I hate that for the most part I can understand most of TIBD but the explanation of that glitch is so odd. If only TI could do something right...

Woo! Thanks, that seemed to have worked

Well (X,I) is the coordinate of the center point and (Z,Y) is the double For( loop coordinate. So it's supposed to be the part that skips the center point. I might be going about that the wrong way though, I just have gotten that to work in other programs so thought it would work here too.