Ya, all 208 (I think that's how many there are) tokens are able to used in Pure TI-BASIC perfectly fine. All you have to do is just access them with assembly first and then just put them in a string or something and paste them into your Pure TI-BASIC game. The only bad thing really is that most of them are two byte tokens.

I've got other things I've been working on lately

I don't know a whole lot about that rare situation you've encountered so I just copied and pasted what you had said Thanks.

Most of us know about the For( slow down issues. If you don't, I'll explain it really fast.

Basically if you have a piece of code that does something like this:

For(A,1,9
If fPart(A/2
\Do something.\
End
When ever that conditional is false it will cause a slow down for the loop, which is annoying. However there are three ways to fix this. First, you can simply put a parenthesis at the end of the For( loop line (so it'd become For(A,1,9)), second, there is a OS fix by BrandonW that apparently fixes it and, three, you can make the If statement an If:Then statement.

Now to the point of this thread. I know I have been curious about this question for quite a while, as I'm sure a few other people. The question is basically: What about if you have nested For( loops? Do you have to close both of them?

Well to be honest we still don't have a definitive answer to this but the current thinking, by a lot of people is that you only have to close the nested one. So for example:

For(A,0,94
For(B,0,62
If not(AB
Pxl-On(B,A
End
End
could become:

For(A,0,94
For(B,0,62)
If not(AB
Pxl-On(B,A
End
End
I just did a quick test with just this example and it seems to have checked out however this hasn't been concretely proven yet. Just thought I'd let everyone know

Courtesy of DJ:

In some rare cases, not closing the parhentesis of a for( loop under such circumnstances can cause the calc to slow down by about 1.5 until the ON key is pressed or the program is exited.

What do you mean?

Ooh, nice to see development in the game, it should be surely fast in the end, there's always a way

I haven't said there has been any development. I was saying that I plan to rewrite the tilemapper eventually though and that I just have ideas.

I have no clue, we can only hope it's fast in the end

I don't believe so. I talked to him about how he was doing he tilemapping and such and I understood part of it but then there was some stuff I didn't understand (something about indexes I think). So I'll probably just write my own routines so I know what's happening and understand how it works.