This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Netham45
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 123
226
« on: October 27, 2011, 04:14:09 pm »
Here's what I'm on now: Dual-core tegra 2 (stock 1GHz, running at anywhere from 400MHz to 1.6GHz) 1GB of RAM 11" touchscreen 4GB MicroSD Card customized install of ubuntu Mah laptop is an i7 720QM (1.6 stock, I keep it at 900MHz unless I'm gaming) 8GB Ram 30GB Kingston SSD 500GB HDD replacing the DVD drive GeForce 240m Server '08 enterprise Desktop: C2D E6700 (1.86GHz stock, I run at 3.15GHz) 5GB ram 4x 250GB hdds 5 monitorsGeForce 8600 & 240 Windows 8 Dev Preview
227
« on: October 25, 2011, 04:00:20 am »
I'd stay away from powering a light off the link port. USB has lines dedicated to power, the link port is just for data communication.
228
« on: October 25, 2011, 02:56:02 am »
From the sounds of it it should be over.
229
« on: October 25, 2011, 02:31:42 am »
One of the routers at my host has been getting DoS'd. I got an e-mail earlier, they said it should be solved by the end of the hour. Expected downtime for "less than 5 minutes" at some point between a half hour from now and an hour from now. The quoted following information explains why.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:52 PM Subject: Fibernet Ticket Update: Ticket #78069 Billable: $0.00 Total: $0.00 To: [email protected]
Your Ticket #78069 has been updated by Jon Bayless:
Customer: Barrett Anderson Ticket description: Connection Issues Ticket category: Colocation Services: Connectivity Problems -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Monday October 24th at approximately 3:50AM Mountain Time, one of Fibernet's routers that provides service to our customers was the target of a large denial of service attack (DOS). The attack lasted about 25 minutes. During the attack, many customers whose service is provisioned on the affected router would have experienced increased latency and moderate or high rates of packet loss or intermittent loss of service. This attack also had a side effect of revealing a bug in the router software that we believe caused the impact of the attack to be amplified beyond what normally would have occurred. Due to this we are scheduling an emergency software upgrade on the router in question as soon as possible.
The software upgrade will result in a minimal interruption in internet service on the affected router. The interruption is expected to last less than 5 minutes. Emergency Maintenance Window:
30 minute duration Monday Oct. 24 11:30PM to Tuesday Oct 25 12AM (Midnight)
Expected service interruption: Less than 5 minutes
Another short interruption happened as you mentioned about 20 minutes ago. The software update should prevent any further issues.
Sorry for the difficulties.
Thanks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To respond to this update or change ticket options, please login to the customer section of our website:
http://www.fiber.net/
Thanks!!
230
« on: October 24, 2011, 10:31:28 pm »
L1 in terms of axe is a static value. It's not a list.
{L1} is one variable, {L1+1} is another, {L1+2} is another. They are all at independent addresses.
Note that it's possible to combine two addresses to form a 16-bit number, or a number from 0-65535 by using {L1}r. This would use L1 and L1+1 to store the larger number.
Edit: If you know what an array is, think of the memory as a giant array from 0x0000-0xFFFF (though obviously not all of this is writable). The brackets simply return the index in ram that you specify as a variable.
231
« on: October 24, 2011, 10:08:38 pm »
The curly brackets dereference a pointer. http://eeems.omnimaga.org/Files/Resources/program%20readmes/Axe/Commands.htm#Das is the usage instructions. Lets say you have the following expression: {L1} L1 essentially always contains the number 0x86EC (or 34540 in base 10). This happens to be the address of a safe spot in RAM. Now, the memory in any computer is laid out numerically. The 83+'s have each individual number equal to one byte of storage space in the calculator. That means that each number can essentially hold from 0 to 255. L1 can hold from 0-255, L1+1 can hold from 0-255. {L1} would get you the value of the number at 0x86EC. {L1+1} would get you the value of the number at 0x86ED. These numbers can then be used as a normal variable. For example: 1->{L1} would store 1 into 0x86EC, or L1. 2->{L1+1} would store 2 into 0x86ED, or L1+1. Lemme know if this doesn't clear it up for you.
232
« on: October 24, 2011, 03:43:36 am »
Hrm, I thought I fixed this last night. It's a bug with the frame not sending the proper cookies, I believe. I'm on my tablet right now, but until I can get the link fixed, use http://www.omnimaga.org/omnomirc
233
« on: October 23, 2011, 09:18:25 pm »
Nightly 10 right now  Yeah their new rapid release process is great ( IMHO ) it allows them to get security fixes out faster, and to get new content out to us to use way faster.
Yea, but they keep touting each release like it's a giant deal. That's been bugging me.
234
« on: October 22, 2011, 09:37:34 pm »
Welcome!
Ndless uses an exploit in the OS for the nspires to provide a stable environment for programs to be developed in and ran.
235
« on: October 20, 2011, 03:13:21 am »
That vaguely reminds me of VVVVVV
236
« on: October 19, 2011, 02:08:39 pm »
In addition to the TIMLPxxxx at the beginning, where xxxx should be replaced by PK\x03\x04, at the bottom of the file, TIPD needs to be replaced by PK\x05\x06.
I didn't have to fix those on mine. o.O
237
« on: October 19, 2011, 02:03:39 pm »
As far as the zip goes (I'm no good with compression) if you remove the first 367 bytes, it looks to be a normal zip that even opens with Windows' built-in zip tool, which is extraordinarily bitchy.
The document.xml at the top appears to be a valid zip entry, once you patch the header. The rest of the zip seems to be running off of the assumption that it's not there (the central directory start is offset by -367 bytes, problem1.xml starts at 0x00, etc...) It's also compressed with the 0x0D compression type.
I repaired the central directory (Added an entry for document, corrected the offset of problem, added one to the file counters, updated the start of directory offset, updated the size of directory, searched for stupid typo for 5 minutes; I didn't update the timestamps on document.xml) in a copy of it and properly placed everything. Here's my resultant zip. Other than that 0x0D compression type, everything opens it fine.
Edit: The -367 byte offset assumes that you haven't fixed the entry for document.zip (remove first 10 bytes, add 0x50,0x4B,0x03,0x04).
238
« on: October 19, 2011, 03:16:55 am »
I'm not familiar with the tns's, but try cutting everything out before the first 0x50,0x4B, as that should be the start of the zip. The central directory might need its offsets updated, too. Check Wikipedia's article on zip files, it's actually pretty damn good.
Edit: If you want to post a small tns, I can check what is off standard. I've worked quite a bit with zips.
239
« on: October 19, 2011, 12:02:49 am »
I've never showed hostmasks, no. I actually don't have anything set up to track them right now, but I can probably get something set up.
240
« on: October 18, 2011, 05:33:37 pm »
Je suis de blocage ce sujet jusqu'à ce qu'un membre du personnel qui peuvent comprendre ce qui se passe correctement peut l'examiner plus à fond. Il ya eu trois rapports sur ce sujet aujourd'hui, et de ce que je peux voir à l'aide d'un traducteur, semble être un tas de disputes.
I am locking this topic until a staff member that can understand what is going on properly can review it more throughly. There have been three reports on this topic today, and from what I can see using a translator, seems to be a bunch of arguing.
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 123
|