556
Computer Programming / Re: Programming on the Android smartphone
« on: May 13, 2011, 09:22:38 pm »
Oh hey, I'd been thinking of trying to compile Python on it myself, this will save me a bunch of time.

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 556
Computer Programming / Re: Programming on the Android smartphone« on: May 13, 2011, 09:22:38 pm »
Oh hey, I'd been thinking of trying to compile Python on it myself, this will save me a bunch of time.
![]() 557
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 09:21:38 pm »
You can get the older versions for free, legally. The only advantage this has is that it works on 64-bit applications too.
559
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 09:17:56 pm »
in capable hands, pretty much.
560
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 09:15:34 pm »
Yea. Basically, what it lets you do is take over functions and stuff in existing code.
void return1() { return 1; } I could then modify that with a detour to return 2 or whatever I want, inside the compiled binary. 561
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 09:13:32 pm »
You'd be really hard pressed to come up with an opensourced detours that works at all
562
Ndless / Re: Ndless 2.0 for TI-Nspire enters beta stage« on: May 13, 2011, 09:06:18 pm »The links no longer work (I believe the server was reformatted or something). Would be nice to get it working again... Quote. 563
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 07:14:22 pm »
Those few buyers are places like McAfee and Symantic, too, so they are willing to shell out the large sums of money for it.
564
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 07:10:58 pm »
They're highly specific limited uses that MS has spent a long time developing for, they need to recoup their development costs somehow.
Basically, it takes highly skilled labor to produce, therefore they spend a large chunk of change. There are few buyers, so they must charge a lot to make their investment back. 565
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 07:05:30 pm »
Supply and Demand kinda falls apart when your supply is near-infinite.
Edit: 600th post! 566
Other / Re: Just found something and would like to show you.« on: May 13, 2011, 07:04:17 pm »
Memory usage is irrelevant for battery usage. At best, those applications take more battery because they're in general more CPU intensive.
Killing Explorer like this will likely save almost no battery life. For what it is, Explorer itself is very lightweight. Disabling things like Aero, Seti@Home, torrents, etc... will have 100x more effect than killing Explorer will. You'd be better off sorting by CPU usage and watching what registers over a 30 second period and killing that. 567
Other / Re: I hope this is a joke...« on: May 13, 2011, 07:00:14 pm »
It legitimately costs that much, mostly because there are very few places where it's worthwhile to use. Basically, you're using it for anti-virus or viruses.
568
OmnomIRC Development / Re: OmnomIRC enabled/disabled setting not remembered when closing browser« on: May 13, 2011, 06:23:28 pm »
You'll be dead before they expire, they still have 240-something years to go.
Also, if they were to expire, you'd just have to reset your options. 569
OmnomIRC Development / Re: Various bits of OmnomIRC Source Code« on: May 13, 2011, 06:19:11 pm »Is that for IRC logs? I didn't know OmnomIRC now used its own MySQL database. The IRC logs are still using files, same as before. OmnomIRC is using SQL, because it was considerably easier than keeping track of things in files, and should yield higher performance over time. 570
OmnomIRC Development / Re: OMnomIRC v2 already broken« on: May 13, 2011, 06:14:20 pm »
two things were to blame.
1) It was burning through SQL connections like there was no tomorrow 2) There was a bug in the Javascript that caused it to crap out whenever a mode change was issued |
|