This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - thepenguin77
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 108
151
« on: January 11, 2013, 09:10:41 pm »
FlashToRam has the quirk that on the TI-83+SE/TI-84+SE, it can read from RAM pages 80h-87h, but not on the TI-84+ non-SE. However, on all models you can use it to copy from regular memory in the 8000h-FFFFh region. See also the Wiki page.
True. Also, you can tell _flashToRam to read ram from the $8000-$FFFF region and it will. At this point, it doesn't even matter what you set as the page to read from since it's not going to change the page swapped into $8000 or $C000. You could even use _flashToRam as a horrible replacement for ldir.
152
« on: January 10, 2013, 03:01:42 pm »
Nope, _flashToRam will work on any page. (However, it won't go over $1F on the 83+BE and $3E on the 84+BE)
Also, to save you the trouble of waiting for a reply, this kind of thing isn't too hard to figure out. I looked at a disassembly to get the answer, but an easy way to do it would be to just debug _flashToRam with wabbitemu and watch what happens to the value of A. Something like "cp $7E" would be a clear giveaway that it is not going to work on a specific page (_writeFlash has this restriction).
153
« on: January 10, 2013, 02:53:40 pm »
now that i think about it, you should get thepenguin to stick an incarnation of this in zstart. that way, people wouldn't be put off by other hooks being overwritten, and it would probably be very popular.
I could do it yes, but I don't know how I would do it and not mess up any of the current hooks (when I do that, people get angry). You could do this (though not as nicely) by simply setting shortcuts for an entire menu in chronological order.
154
« on: January 06, 2013, 02:19:51 pm »
I'm going to guess you haven't seen this yet. Anyways, at 478 you shouldn't have to worry about anything. However, if you go past 560 on specifically the 83+, you'll have to use bcall(_fillBasePageTable) when you quit.
155
« on: January 06, 2013, 02:15:39 pm »
But what if you lose it? It's easier to get hold of a philips head screwdriver.
Find a flat head screwdriver that fits into the torx heads. (You can file it a bit if you need to). I have 1 screwdriver that can take out every single screw on my calculator.
156
« on: January 05, 2013, 04:09:29 pm »
Wow, thank you jacobly. I've been hex editing programs into appvars for the past year. This makes it a lot easier now that I don't have to manually recalculate the checksum.
157
« on: January 05, 2013, 04:05:25 pm »
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to connect the +5V and GND of the usb connection of a TI-84+ to the battery + and -. I would place a switch inbetween ofcourse (in case of willing to use with batteries and usb). The batteries deliver 4.8-6V (rechargeable and non-rechargeable), so the 5V of the usb would be the perfect voltage. I'm not really sure though, since it might maybe somehow destroy something, and I don't want that.
The reason I want to change this is because I only use my 84+ on my desk near my pc, and not even often, just sometimes for some gametesting for the forum here. I don't use it enough, so everytime I want to use it I have to begin a giant quest to find the needed batteries for it. With the usb connected, i'd just have to connect it to my pc and get started...
I'm a little confused as to what you are going to do exactly. I see two options: 1. Strip a USB cord and stick that straight into the battery cartridge of the 84+ 2. Internally wire the calculator's own USB port into the battery cartridge For option 1, it would totally work without any restrictions. I believe the 84+ uses a max current of like 42mA and the minimum for USB spec is 100mA, so you should be fine. For option 2, I have no idea what would happen. The ground of the USB is probably the same ground as the battery cartridge, so that probably wouldn't be a problem. But when you wire the USB positive to the battery cartridge positive, weird stuff might happen. I guess the only way to find out would be to try it. If it doesn't end up working, you could install a hook (I could make it) so that you can selectively disable USB so that the calculator doesn't actually try to connect to the PC/wall.
158
« on: December 23, 2012, 09:40:25 pm »
Can you overclock a TI-84+ or TI-84+SE? I know you can overclock some calcs...
(Also, would this be the right section for this thread?)
I'm pretty sure you can't do this. The 84+ uses a single chip that contains both the processor and the ram. TI makes this chip and it has the timing circuitry built into it. To overclock the 84+, you'd have to take this chip apart and mess with it, which is basically impossible.
159
« on: December 19, 2012, 11:57:15 pm »
Well, we can't just let a 0 reply post sit here, so here is my better version of your routine. ;you don't need to do the $FF thing ld a, $FD out (01), a ;once this is set, you don't have to reset it unless you change it ei ;this is for the halts waitKey: halt ;this will lower battery usage (lol) and is roughly a 1/100 sec delay in a, (01) add a, a ;moves bit 7 into carry position jr c, waitKey halt ;this is known as debouncing, when keys are pressed, they often barely halt ; connect, disconnect, and then solidly reconnect halt ; without debouncing, you might accidentally press the button twice in a, (01) ; this is only needed in menus (and even then, it's optional) add a, a ; the .03 sec delay was rather arbitrary jr c, waitKey ret
Not only does mine do key debouncing, but it ended up smaller
160
« on: December 15, 2012, 11:33:38 pm »
After you are happy with your tutorial, you should cross post it I'm not sure how many people actually go to those sections, but it's better than getting buried in all the threads.
161
« on: December 14, 2012, 02:00:27 am »
Could you find some repeatable way to trigger this? Or a screenshot perhaps? That would allow us to figure out what is actually happening.
162
« on: December 13, 2012, 02:52:01 pm »
zStart represent!
(Yeah, I'm going to assume this is totally my fault. MathPrint is the devil and I hate it. A lot of stuff in zStart crashes if you have MathPrint enabled even though I specifically coded it to do stuff differently when MathPrint is enabled.)
163
« on: December 04, 2012, 05:07:44 pm »
That sounds fine to me. I gave it a 5-star for stability in my chart as well as a 4-star for collateral damage (but that was because I didn't actually know).
So I think you're good.
164
« on: December 01, 2012, 11:59:54 pm »
Oh god. You do realize that this was FAKE?
Of course it's easy to tell that it's fake now, but at the time I think I did a pretty good job. I posted the fake 2.71 to the forums, answered a few questions about it, and then dropped offline. Things escalated pretty quickly and aside from one tiny mistake I made on the OS file (some extra data at the end that TI adds for no apparent reason), the OS was completely legitimate. It installed on calculators and seemed to be exactly something TI would do. You should have been there...
165
« on: November 30, 2012, 01:30:10 am »
Well, when I use zStart 1.3.010 (the one linked in your sig), this problem doesn't exist. But with 1.3.010b (the one four posts above), any time a BASIC program calls input or prompt, the calc will freeze and I have to pull a battery. Edit : It happens exactly when I press enter to confirm my input.
Just bumpin' this report as it seems like no one saw it.
I saw it, but I don't update zStart that often (I also didn't want to make a second sub-update). My only reply could have possibly been like "OK" or something. And since Hayleia's post started a new page, I didn't see it again to quote you. But have no fear, every time I update zStart, I begin at the previous update and fix every problem that someone mentions.
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 108
|