Thats much better than TI-BASIC

I think TI-84+ BASIC does For(Z,0,1000:End in 1.5 or 2 seconds, but there is no sprite nor rectangle command, so sprites have to be drawn pixel by pixel, using line or text commands, and maths are not very fast.

Actually, in the program above, the ?V line is a shorthand for PRINT V. So it's actually looping and printing each value. (Though, that's usually more a test of the speed of the print statement than that of the loop.)

Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on January 27, 2014, 11:47:30 pm

I think TI-84+ BASIC does For(Z,0,1000:End in 1.5 or 2 seconds, but there is no sprite nor rectangle command, so sprites have to be drawn pixel by pixel, using line or text commands, and maths are not very fast.

Actually, in the program above, the ?V line is a shorthand for PRINT V. So it's actually looping and printing each value. (Though, that's usually more a test of the speed of the print statement than that of the loop.)

Oh, right, then it's even better. In TI-84+ BASIC I think this would loop 100 times per second using Disp (with scrolling) and almost 200 times a second using output. So Petit Computer is definitively pretty nice when it comes to speed.

The only issue I have is if a game has a particularly high amount of QC codes (eg 100), it must takes hours to scan everything

Minecraft DS Beta 2.0.0 Prerelease 1! http://petitcomputer.wikia.com/wiki/Minecraft_DS