I think it should still be permitted that it be said; perhaps someone can find a less offensive way than as in my example to say it.
It's not a viewpoint I agree with, not at all, but saying that one isn't allowed to carefully state one's opinion seems to border on outright censorship, IMO.

Yeah it definitively needs to be said in a way that is less offensive as Jkag's. For example your comment should be prefixed with a comment saying you have nothing against gay people. I just think that on Omni, bigotry should be frowned upon.

I read [present tense] this and agree wholeheartedly
Okay, we have two people in concord, who's next?

From Google: "concord: 1. Agreement or harmony between people or groups."
Basically, you and I are in agreement about this. (inasmuch as I can tell)

Banned from IRC for his innapropriate behavior (not just the gay comment, but him saying he doesn't care if people get offended and him being rude in general to people there), and banned from the forums for his ragequit for the sole purpose of starting more drama

I bet they last a week since it's his first ban and the nDoom policy isn't in effect. Maybe it's shorter, though. I just saw the +b and know he was banned on the site too.

I bet they last a week since it's his first ban and the nDoom policy isn't in effect. Maybe it's shorter, though. I just saw the +b and know he was banned on the site too.

What's the nDoom policy?

During certain parts of the year, where a lot of troublesome users joins, rules are enforced more strictly and to prevent people from other calc sites from telling us how to run our site, we also add an extra rule disallowing others from trying to decide how Omni should be ran.

This is usually active during parts of the Summer and late Fall. It was active last Spring too, though, because of a troll invasion caused by nDoom (TI-Nspire port of DOOM) being featured on a troll site.