« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Axe in Wikipedia  (Read 6846 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ashbad

  • Guest
Axe in Wikipedia
« on: April 02, 2011, 01:17:43 pm »
whilst it still lacks it's own page, I think I made a good start today: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TI-84_Plus_series#Axe_Parser_Language

^-^ What do you guys think?

EDIT: and yes I made it :P
« Last Edit: April 02, 2011, 01:19:43 pm by Ashbad »
Logged

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2011, 01:27:09 pm »
Nice! I'm surprised there isn't a spot for Hybrid Basic though.
Logged

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2011, 01:27:47 pm »
I think someone should make a subsection for that under TI-BASIC.
Logged



Ashbad

  • Guest
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2011, 01:28:36 pm »
I guess it's our job to do all of these things, as the page for the 84+ seems quite bare right now :~
Logged

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2011, 01:30:48 pm »
Quote from: Ashbad on April 02, 2011, 01:17:43 pm
whilst it still lacks it's own page, I think I made a good start today: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TI-84_Plus_series#Axe_Parser_Language

^-^ What do you guys think?

EDIT: and yes I made it :P

I think you should remove the 'solely'. I know he's doing it alone, but people like Runer helped with optimizations.
Logged

Ashbad

  • Guest
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2011, 01:31:06 pm »
good idea ;)
Logged

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2011, 01:35:37 pm »
Quote from: Ashbad on April 02, 2011, 01:31:06 pm
good idea ;)

I also added a few stuff in the end (last paragraph) concerning Assembly VS Axe.
Logged

Ashbad

  • Guest
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2011, 01:36:37 pm »
not bad scout, good addition IMHO :)
Logged

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2011, 01:41:38 pm »
Nice, I think it definitively deserves to be referenced, considering so many people use it online for development.
Logged

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2011, 01:56:55 pm »
As an update for people who don't watch the IRC, we're going to do a pretty big overhaul of the entire section about languages.

And Ashbad, you have 2222 posts O.O
Logged



Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2011, 02:02:18 pm »
Ah ok sounds good. :)
Logged

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2011, 02:41:59 pm »
Well, just finished a lot of changes. The main programming sections have been moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TI-83_series#Programming (since they apply to all calculators of the TI-83 Plus series, not just the 84s), and a short paragraph was placed where the sections used to be. It links back to the section on the 83 page.

So, what do you think? :)

EDIT: Whoo, +122 :D
« Last Edit: April 02, 2011, 02:44:03 pm by Deep Thought »
Logged
+1/-0 karm for this message



Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2011, 11:48:32 pm »
Seems fine to me so far. I think it describes the languages well. I would have added BBC Basic and C, but unfortunately their popularity is not high enough to be mentionned I think. On Omni about half of the programmers use Axe and Omni has like half of the entire community activity, so I guess it's as notable as the other languages.
Logged

Offline Freyaday

  • The One And Only Serial Time Killing Catboy-Capoeirista-Ballerino
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • **********
  • Posts: 1970
  • Rating: +128/-15
  • I put on my robe and pixel hat...
    • View Profile
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2011, 12:03:59 am »
Finally! I was going to mention the absence of Axe on Wikipedia eventually, but I never got around to it.
Logged
Quote from: JustCause on March 29, 2011, 11:44:58 pm
In other news, Frey continues kicking unprecedented levels of ass.
Proud member of LF#N--Lolis For #9678B6 Names


I'm a performer at heart; I stole it last week.
My Artwork!

Offline Michael_Lee

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1019
  • Rating: +124/-9
    • View Profile
Re: Axe in Wikipedia
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2011, 12:26:33 am »
I like all the new information that was added.

I'm not particularly good at writing, so I'm not really one to talk, but I kind of think that there's way too much detailed information in just the first introductory section, and too little information in all of the actual sections.  Perhaps information should be shifted around a little bit?
Logged
My website: Currently boring.

Projects:
Axe Interpreter
   > Core: Done
   > Memory: Need write code to add constants.
   > Graphics: Rewritten.  Needs to integrate sprites with constants.
   > IO: GetKey done.  Need to add mostly homescreen IO stuff.
Croquette:
   > Stomping bugs
   > Internet version: On hold until I can make my website less boring/broken.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »