Actually, I was thinking of changing the single quote to be an ascii character constant like 'A'.  Not sure what will replace it yet, maybe the decimal point since I haven't used it yet and its a single key press instead of [2nd][angle][down][enter]

Quote from: Quigibo on March 01, 2010, 09:05:53 pm

Actually, I was thinking of changing the single quote to be an ascii character constant like 'A'.  Not sure what will replace it yet, maybe the decimal point since I haven't used it yet and its a single key press instead of [2nd][angle][down][enter]

I like that idea, but does it rule out floating point numbers?

Well what about if you had specific code for 84+'s and some for 83+'s and you wanted the compiler to smartly compile it, like a clock function that calls the clock on one, and for the 83+ it just uses cycles or something.
It would help for the more advanced users.

Well I would be ok with compiling smartly. We could just give out the source and people could compile it themselves. Unless we send it to ticalc then we would just make different versions. Running smartly would make it run slower.

So if it is on a 15MHZ calc it will compile certain code and on 6MHZ it will compile something else. That makes it easier to compile for timing and such.