0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
It's definitely possible, but also likely to be less efficient, since Axe's routines are designed around the various quirks of the 84+. It would still run faster on the nspire, but probably not as fast as C, def. not as fast as assembly.
Least efficient, but most compatible way would be to have an 83+ emulator
In other news, Frey continues kicking unprecedented levels of ass.
axv_A =$9CFBaxv_B =$9CFDaxv_C =$9CFFaxv_D =$9D01axv_E =$9D03axv_F =$9D05axv_G =$9D07axv_H =$9D09axv_I =$9D0Baxv_J =$9D0Daxv_K =$9D0Faxv_L =$9D11axv_M =$9D13axv_N =$9D15axv_O =$9D17axv_P =$9D19axv_Q =$9D1Baxv_R =$9D1Daxv_S =$9D1Faxv_T =$9D21axv_U =$9D23axv_V =$9D25axv_W =$9D27axv_X =$9D29axv_Y =$9D2Baxv_Z =$9D2Daxv_Theta =$9D2Faxv_R1 =$9D31axv_R2 =$9D33axv_R3 =$9D35axv_R4 =$9D37axv_R5 =$9D39axv_R6 =$9D3Baxv_Y1 =$9D3Daxv_Y1Page =$9D3Faxv_Y2 =$9D40axv_Y2Page =$9D42axv_Y3 =$9D43axv_Y3Page =$9D45axv_Y4 =$9D46axv_Y4Page =$9D48axv_Y5 =$9D49axv_Y5Page =$9D4Baxv_Y6 =$9D4Caxv_Y6Page =$9D4Eaxv_Y7 =$9D4Faxv_Y7Page =$9D51axv_Y8 =$9D52axv_Y8Page =$9D54axv_Y9 =$9D55axv_Y9Page =$9D57axv_Y0 =$9D58axv_Y0Page =$9D5Aaxv_SpriteBuff =$9D5Baxv_RandSeed =$9D63axv_Y1t =$84EBaxv_Y2t =$84EDaxv_X1t =$84EFaxv_X2t =$84F1axv_Y3t =$84F3axv_Y4t =$84F5axv_X3t =$84F7axv_X4t =$84F9axv_Y5t =$84FBaxv_Y6t =$84FDaxv_X5t =$84FFaxv_X6t =$8501
they aren'taxv_Y4Page =$9D48axv_Y5Page =$9D4B
Axe 1.2.0 isn't working on WabbitEmu or cemetech's jTIfied. Is this a bug in Axe or a bug with the emulators? Axe works on my calc.Also, when's the next version of Axe gonna be out? It keeps getting better and better!