Author Topic: Which Axe version do you use? (Read 33692 times)

Eeems · « **Reply #105 on:** December 11, 2012, 03:38:51 pm »

Not at all, it would run faster, space wise there would be no optimization though.

squidgetx · « **Reply #106 on:** December 12, 2012, 09:54:36 am »

Runer, as far as I can tell, the grayscale in 1.2.0 is indistinguishable from 1.1.2 besides the obvious difference that it's faster.

(That might be why some people are saying that it's 'worse'...the timing changed by a few thousand cycles than when they compiled with 1.1.2)

leafy · « **Reply #107 on:** December 12, 2012, 10:16:40 am »

If you're using interrupts, then there's very little difference. If your program isn't fast enough in the slightest, though, the difference becomes obvious.

willrandship · « **Reply #108 on:** December 13, 2012, 05:23:03 am »

So it's a change in manually timed grayscale.

pimathbrainiac · « **Reply #109 on:** January 06, 2013, 04:16:52 pm »

Is 1.2.1 going to be added to the poll?

Spoiler For Spoiler:

Sorunome · « **Reply #110 on:** January 06, 2013, 04:21:31 pm »

you mean 1.2.1a

With the little bugfix

* Sorunome runs

Deep Toaster · « **Reply #111 on:** January 06, 2013, 08:50:10 pm »

I'm still on 1.1.2 because I haven't done anything over the break

And I'm always behind by a couple versions anyway for, uh, security reasons (read: laziness).

Author Topic: Which Axe version do you use? (Read 33692 times)

Eeems

Re: Which Axe version do you use?

squidgetx

Re: Which Axe version do you use?

leafy

Re: Which Axe version do you use?

willrandship

Re: Which Axe version do you use?

pimathbrainiac

Re: Which Axe version do you use?

Sorunome

Re: Which Axe version do you use?

Deep Toaster

Re: Which Axe version do you use?