Author Topic: 1337 BASIC (Read 6623 times)

tifreak · « **on:** December 03, 2005, 04:14:00 pm »

If you are looking for optimized BASIC code, this will be the place to look.

If you are looking for 'restriction code', you do this:

L1(1)+(L1(1)<99)->L1(1

This will keep a stat from exceeding '99' without needing an If statement.

(I found this out while porting AOD from the 83+ to the 82. Trust me, after figuring this out, I called my self many names... :lmao:

)

crzyrbl · « **Reply #1 on:** December 03, 2005, 07:03:00 pm »

L1(1)+(99L1(1

save 2 bits

Spellshaper · « **Reply #2 on:** December 04, 2005, 01:23:00 am »

Yeah, it

tifreak · « **Reply #3 on:** December 04, 2005, 08:27:00 am »

QuoteBegin-crzyrbl+4 December 2005, 1:03-->

QUOTE (crzyrbl @ 4 December 2005, 1:03)

L1(1)+(99L1(1

save 2 bits

Yeah, I guess that will work.

Maybe I will need to go back through AOD on the 83+ and do some optimizing...

After of course, AOD 82 makes its debut...

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #4 on:** December 04, 2005, 02:56:00 pm »

nice you are porting your old games to 82?

tifreak · « **Reply #5 on:** December 05, 2005, 04:35:00 am »

I am porting AOD (The graphical version) to the 82 and the 86, and then will go from there...I know AODOLD and AODR won't go to the 82, unless I learn asm for it... I might be able to port aod2 to it, but I don't really know what kind of dependance aod2 has for strings...

I am however, going to go through all my old games and begin updating them with the newer stuff that I know, for optimization...

CDI · « **Reply #6 on:** December 05, 2005, 12:33:00 pm »

@tifreak8x and first post - it's technally called boolean logic

i.e.

c1-->

CODE

ec1ClrHome
1->C:1->D
Repeat X=45
Output(C,D,0
getKey->X
If X:Output(C,D,"
C+(X=34 and C!=8)-(X=25 and C!=1->C
D+(X=26 and D!=16)-(X=24 and D!=1->D
Endc2

ec2

ta da!

100b EXACTALLY!

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #7 on:** December 05, 2005, 12:49:00 pm »

sound nice, I might post diortem's one soon.

@tifreak8x: yeah 82 calcs doesnt have strings in BASIC

tifreak · « **Reply #8 on:** December 06, 2005, 03:22:00 pm »

QuoteBegin-xlibman+5 December 2005, 18:49-->

QUOTE (xlibman @ 5 December 2005, 18:49)

sound nice, I might post diortem's one soon.

@tifreak8x: yeah 82 calcs doesnt have strings in BASIC

I know, but it makes it more fun to program for...

katmaster · « **Reply #9 on:** December 11, 2005, 06:32:00 pm »

The main problem with 82s and 83s is their lack of archive.

tifreak · « **Reply #10 on:** December 12, 2005, 01:23:00 am »

It isn't so much a problem, just a challenge to program good, long games for on a very limited platform...

AOD82 is almost complete...

crzyrbl · « **Reply #11 on:** December 30, 2005, 09:57:00 am »

QuoteBegin-CDI+5 December 2005, 18:33-->

QUOTE (CDI @ 5 December 2005, 18:33)

c1-->

CODE

ec1ClrHome
1->C:1->D
Repeat X=45
Output(C,D,0
getKey->X
If X:Output(C,D,"
C+(X=34 and C!=8)-(X=25 and C!=1->C
D+(X=26 and D!=16)-(X=24 and D!=1->D
Endc2

ec2

which is faster, this:

c1

-->

CODE

ec1C+(X=34 and C!=8)-(X=25 and C!=1->C
D+(X=26 and D!=16)-(X=24 and D!=1->Dc2

ec2

or this:

c1

-->

CODE

ec1C+(X=34)(C!=8)-(X=25)(C!=1->C
D+(X=26)(D!=16)-(X=24)(D!=1->Dc2

ec2

the lower one adds 4b but doesnt have to go though the "and" method.

dragon__lance · « **Reply #12 on:** December 30, 2005, 12:52:00 pm »

y don't u test it?

MathStuf · « **Reply #13 on:** January 04, 2006, 01:14:00 pm »

It depends on how BASIC handles conditionals. If it looks ahead and quits out of an AND if any are wrong, go with the first, otherwise, test it in a loop. If it does, put the one most likely to be wrong first.

Author Topic: 1337 BASIC (Read 6623 times)

crzyrbl

CDI

katmaster

crzyrbl

dragon__lance

MathStuf