I have already unveiled this project on TIBD and I am liking it enough to post it here. I started this back near the end of June, but after a few days I finally came across something called Axe Parser. I thought Axe was pretty cool and was pretty far along compared to my start of a programming language, so I put it aside. Then I started thinking. Axe doesn't actually execute the code it compiles, which is what mine did. Mine was an interpreted language whereas Axe actually compiled it into an assembly program. Axe has the advantage of speed and the fact that it is pretty far along in development, whereas mine has the advantage of using less memory. I just checked my computer yesterday and it seems that I have deleted everything except one random file which detailed the first few commands. Today I started over and I made the basic outline of the program and I made the Pause command. The Pause in my original program was very similar to the one in Axe and I did not change that.

And for those who are curious, yes it is in hex at the moment. I have got two small calls in their mnemonic form, I will work on the rest when I have time (so right now).

prgmA is the program
prgmB is the example use (not really much of an example)

This sounds similar to stuff like xlib, am I right?

Sorry I am late to getting back to y'all, I am having to fix the charger on my computer, but yes, it will be an actual language instead of a library.

Also, couple questions. Are you going to eventually make this an app or are you going to keep it as a program? Also, how fast will it be?

Interesting. Just make sure to start with the small stuff first then the larger stuff afterward and try to make sure the interpreter is not too large. Seems interesting. One thing I like with BASIC is that code is smaller than Axe, but data is ridiculously large.

Again, sorry to be late responding.
-I can throw in the ability to call assembly programs, but for now only up to 768 byte of code.
-I plan to make it an app, but for now it is a program. It takes a short time opening the asm program (like all asm programs), but while it is actually interpreting the code, it is just as fast as assembly (because it is). If I made a command equivalent to an OS command, it would be faster.
-For now, the source is in hex (because that is how I am programming), but I am slowly converting it to mnemonics when I get the chance.
-I definitely plan to start small and then I will build my way up. I think I will wait to add crazy things like labels and jumps and calls.

Actually, I just thought of this with that last one... I think I am going to make calls end with "End" and the code end with "Stop" because I only need to change one byte of the code for that.

YAY coding in Hex is super hard, you are one of the few who can make games and stuff using HEX 100%, though.

This sounds really interesting. And also, you write asm in hex? That's awesome! I'm an unbelievably huge noob at asm so I'm wondering how would one go about doing that?

Wow, you program Assembly in hex? That is seriously badass! How many programmers can say they program practically in binary ^^