I misread your code a bit, sorry.

Quote from: ScoutDavid on November 27, 2010, 09:40:31 am

Now, I want Pic1 to move 10pixels right, every time I press the key right (which is getkey(3)).

However, what your code would do if that were valid syntax (see what I said on Pt-Off( above) is this:
XOR Pic1 at (0,0) (equivalent to just drawing it if the area is empty)
Erase Pic1 at (0,0)
Until you press right, flash Pic1 at (0,10) (I think you mean (10,0). The Pt- commands take their arguments as X,Y,SPRITE)

So, is there another way of deleting something, or I can replace 0,0 using Pt-Change with a blank image?

!!! So, I can do Pt-Off(0,0,Pic1 to delete it?

Getkey with a number in parhentesis at the end is indeed what you use if you want to have multiple keypresses. For example, getkey(54) will check if 2ND is pressed. It will return 1 if it is and 0 if it isn't.

However, I think for multiple keypresses in a loop you would need to do the following:

Repeat getKey(3) and (getkey(4))

because of an axe glitch or something.

Could you explain in more details what you are trying to do?

Also I hope this projects continues again soon.

I have an Axe Doubt now:

I have Pic1 in coordenates(0,0,).

Now, I want Pic1 to move 10pixels right, every time I press the key right (which is getkey(3)).

This is what I'm trying to do, which will help me with the turbo

oh, maybe he did in 0.4.5.  Of course, I wouldn't know, I can only use 0.4.4

Code: [Select]

:[38107C1010282828->Pic1
:Pt-Change(0,0,Pic1
:DispGraph
:Repeat getKey(3)
:Pt-Off(0,0,Pic1
:Pt-Change(0,10,Pic1
:End
Back to code.. How's that?

So, as I said before, Pt-Off( actually still draws the sprite, it just clears what's behind it first
To get rid of what's at (0,0), you can use either of the methods I mentioned before.

yes, that should work.
                  || |||   
(better now? vvvvv

lol, ill edit

Quote from: ScoutDavid on November 27, 2010, 01:53:15 pm

Quote from: aeTIos on November 27, 2010, 01:52:42 pm

yes

That's a very uncomprehensible reply now, is that a 'yes it works very good scoutDavid, you rule'?

That would pretty much be the same thing, aside from the you rule part

It was, of course, a joke. I'm now printing this code and will then implement it in my code.

Now, I still have to divide a 16*16 sprite I have into 4 8*8 sprites to make a loading screen (not needed but it's professional)

yes, that should work.
                  || |||   
(better now? vvvvv

Yeah better, but where's the 'you rule!'? hahah j/k

Now, I still have to divide a 16*16 sprite I have into 4 8*8 sprites to make a loading screen (not needed but it's professional).

You think it looks pro?