Looks nice Winsy, as always. Pretty soon, ticalc will have a whole folder for flappy bird category games

Yet another Flappy bird clone I see. It does look pretty nice though. I like the bird sprite too, It kind of reminds me of pac-man.

to much flappy. i like it!!!

Looks nice, but I think that at this rate, it's only a matter of time before the following links work http://www.ticalc.org/pub/83plus/basic/games/arcade/flappybird/ & http://www.ticalc.org/pub/83plus/asm/games/arcade/flappybird/

I actually like the sprite, so i wouldn't mind if you left it the same.

Some optimizations I might have seen in your code ("might" because maybe they don't work, try at your own risks ).

You did that: 0->Y->E->P
But for some reason, you didn't do that, just below: 1->F->Q
Moreover, +1 is more optimized than 1 (if hl=0 obviously) so you can do 0->Y->E->P+1->F->Q.

rand^35+1->R
35->S
rand^35+1->T
69->U
rand^35+1->V
You can routinize the rand^35+1->V, and maybe you can do 35->S*2-1->U to avoid loading 69, but I am not sure it saves that much space. Must save one byte at most -.-

~1->X
For(12)
Pt-On(X,43,Pic2)^^r
X+8->X
End
can be written as
~9->X
For(12)
Pt-On(X+8->X,43,Pic2)^^r
End
(where ~ is the little minus sign)

Repeat getKey(15)
<whatever>
End
is less optimized as
While 1
<whatever>
EndIf getKey(15)
if you don't mind <whatever> to be executed at least once.

If E<<0
0->E
1->F
End
can be written as
If E<<0
->F-1->E
End

!If F
E-38->E
If E<<0
->F-1->E
End
Else
E+25->E
End
is better as
!If F
If E<<0
->F-1->E
End
~38->E
Else
25
End
+E->E

A=B?? is less optimized than A-B?.

If B=9
0->F
500->E
End
is better as
!If B-9
0->F
500->E
End
and is even better as
!If B-9
->F
500->E
End

rand^35+1->R was said previously, but you still can routinize rand^35+1

Rect(83,0,10,R
Rect(83,R+24,10,39
IIRC, you have a 84+ or a 84+SE, so you can waste two bytes and close those parentheses to avoid triggering unnecessary Axe bugs
Matref usef to have only a regular 83+, so he used to did everything to save space, but that's not your case (and by the way, if this is the reason why he lost points in source code in the Omnimaga contest, this is stupid because his code was ten times more optimized than TipOver's. TipOver for example included that part
T++
If T=256
0->T
End
which can be optimized as
T++
If =256
0->T
End
then
T++
!If -256
0->T
End
then
T++
!If -256
->T
End
and if you think 4 seconds about 256, you even realize that this fits in 3 bytes with {°T}++).

Pic0+X is less optimized than X+Pic0. Always put constants at the end of an expression (if you can, obviously).

Text(0,0,P>Dec is better as Text(0,,P>Dec) (same for Text(0,0,"Score: ",P>Dec). And instead of calculating P at the previous line, you can include it in the Text command. I feel like P+(Q=15??(S=15??U=15))->P is optimizable but I have school in one hour

That's all for now
Once again, I advise you to backup your code and try those optimizations one after the other and try them separately in case I coined "opts" that don't work
And of course, those are only "basic" opts, I didn't try to figure out what the whole code did to find an algorithm that does the same in a faster/smaller way.

I don't know if that optimizes speed either, but if you use this, don't use the optimizations I added because this
If E<<0
->F-1->E
End
will not do the same with a E.32768.