« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Secret Project Teaser  (Read 6318 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: Secret Project Teaser
« Reply #30 on: October 22, 2010, 09:28:55 pm »
Yeah, it shouldn't be too bad, and there is auto-optimization as well, so things like cp 0 don't get through.
Logged

Offline nemo

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1203
  • Rating: +95/-11
    • View Profile
Re: Secret Project Teaser
« Reply #31 on: October 22, 2010, 09:31:25 pm »
any idea when we'll be able to try it for ourselves?
Logged

Offline qazz42

  • LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
  • *********
  • Posts: 1130
  • Rating: +30/-12
  • hiiiiiiiii
    • View Profile
Re: Secret Project Teaser
« Reply #32 on: October 22, 2010, 10:34:11 pm »
yay, now I can program in C#, and program my calc

O:
Logged

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: Secret Project Teaser
« Reply #33 on: October 22, 2010, 10:35:09 pm »
In a while.  I haven't implemented math, non-string literals, any libraries (minus the hard coded methods used in my posted code), and I haven't implemented variables, stack, or heap at all.
Logged

Offline ztrumpet

  • The Rarely Active One
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 5712
  • Rating: +364/-4
  • If you see this, send me a PM. Just for fun.
    • View Profile
Re: Secret Project Teaser
« Reply #34 on: October 22, 2010, 10:38:32 pm »
Wow.  I hope this makes it to completion.  This would be a great way to program.  Good luck on it Sir. :)
Logged

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: Secret Project Teaser
« Reply #35 on: October 22, 2010, 10:39:21 pm »
Thanks ztrumpet.  I don't think I'm going to support generics yet, by the way.
Logged

Offline calcdude84se

  • Needs Motivation
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2272
  • Rating: +78/-13
  • Wondering where their free time went...
    • View Profile
Re: Secret Project Teaser
« Reply #36 on: October 23, 2010, 03:14:45 pm »
Looks cool! :D
Also, technical notice: either SDCC or Z88DK (I'm not sure which) does perform optimizations on the generated assembly code, but, as stated, the optimized assembly code is still far from good. Good luck on doing better! :)
Logged
"People think computers will keep them from making mistakes. They're wrong. With computers you make mistakes faster."
-Adam Osborne
Spoiler For "PartesOS links":
I'll put it online when it does something.
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »