ah, yes I see. well it's not that much to hard code it, and it increases the speed.

On a off topic note, do you mind if I add Reverse Snake and Num2str to the staff archives when I get some time?

Yeah sure, although the link for Reverse Snake is messed up since they deleted it when i added a new version of it, but i can get you either one and/or both if you want, and Num2Str should be ready.

Oh ok, you can upload it in a post here and I'll try to add it. I would like screenshots of Reverse Snake, though, if the game is not compatible with emulators. (for utilities, though, I don't add screenshots)

Yeah I put in Screen Shots with the game when I uploaded it, but they didn't add it I'll get it up soon

replying about optimization ask...

B≠0 could be B?

instead of:
:For(θ,1,10):End
it is smaller
rand(X
where X is a number...

Or better:

:Text(‾1,8T-8,6B-6,"O
:For(θ,1,10):End
:Text(‾1,8T-8,6B-6,"o
:For(θ,1,10):End
:Text(‾1,8T-8,6B-6,"o
:For(θ,1,10):End
:Text(‾1,8T-8,6B-6,"∙
:For(θ,1,10):End

I would try to do something like:
:For(θ,10,40
:Text(‾1,8T-8,6B-6,sub("Ooo∙",int(θ/10),1
:End

This applies to other places I think (supposing place of draw is the same...)

Use math rules man:
6(B+1)-6=6B+6-6=6B
it appears in different parts and different ways. Other:
15(A-1)-15+B=15A-15-15+B=15A-30+B
Search...

""=string. I am not sure but could crash some "old" models (Ti-83 or even TI-83+ first OS versions)?

length(Str1) is used often... Why not store a number variable and use it from there? Or have you already used all variables?

In UTI, there are some programmers that could dissect better your code

Cool side projects. Even I am doing some TI-BASIC games for my surprise. One small game on the go and other after that.
I will need to practise all that String stuff

that's kind of old and I would get disqualified if I posted code to get looked at....thanks though, I'm resisting the urge to look at the optimizations well I also started a new topic if you want to take a look at this, and I know that UTI would be great, I've seen weergoose's (sp?) optimizations, they are crazy

New topic? Where? Searching...

I am getting used to weregoose's skills. They are great but with some imagination and some knowledge of math and others, you will evently start doing some cool tricks.
But optimizing old code is quite fun (or not when you are blinded by it...)

Not trying to necro post or antyhing (heh), but I'm re-staring this project. I still have all the code and what not associated with this, but the only thing is, I don't have the hard copy paper maps that I had made when I was working on this project, so I will have to go through all my map code again and re-draw my maps.

This was going to be my contest entry oh so long ago, but now I just want to finish it. (will post screenies soon of current progress)

Awesome!  I can't wait to see progress!

Well I found my hard copy notes and map data, so it'll be much easier to make some progress now that I have all of that. Now to just finish making the map.