« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down

Author Topic: TI 83+/84+ randomness  (Read 21962 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #75 on: January 30, 2011, 11:22:32 pm »
thx :D

although i'll have to reduce them in size...
see what i can do ;)


EDIT: I used basicbuilder to convert in into an app :D
now size matters less :D (still have to test the clock though - WORKS :D :D :D :D ;D ;D)
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 05:11:14 am by ferox »
Logged
on hold:

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #76 on: January 31, 2011, 11:35:13 am »
i won't be around the next few days i think. my pc doesn't get the internet anymore :(  :banghead:  :crazy:  :mad:
Logged
on hold:

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #77 on: January 31, 2011, 11:39:39 am »
Um, the time commands only work on the 84+/SE in case you are worried about compatability. 83+ users won't be able to use this program.
Logged

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #78 on: January 31, 2011, 02:31:44 pm »
Quote from: Xeda112358 on January 31, 2011, 11:39:39 am
Um, the time commands only work on the 84+/SE in case you are worried about compatability. 83+ users won't be able to use this program.
i did think about that... but i wondered, is it possible to send with ti connect, without the function error? or i could make 2 versions: 84+ and 83+

btw, internet works again :D
Logged
on hold:

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #79 on: January 31, 2011, 02:55:09 pm »
Glad you fixed your internet. As for 83+ the program must not have 84+ only commands, else a transfer error will occur. You would have to make 2 version.
Logged

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #80 on: January 31, 2011, 04:02:58 pm »
right, i will do that then. btw, i think next version will be an app (pics still required, and setupeditor won't work for some reason) and will ber released tomorrow...

with the app availability i think i will release it as 1.0.0 when there are 100 codes (98 normal and 2 secret)
Logged
on hold:

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #81 on: February 01, 2011, 03:56:16 pm »
Kk, good luck!
Logged

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #82 on: February 01, 2011, 04:12:44 pm »
thx. btw, setupeditor does not seem to work in app mode...
or is it just me? :P
Logged
on hold:

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #83 on: February 01, 2011, 10:17:13 pm »
Does SetUpEditor work regularly on your calc? I never knew that Basic Builder had problems with that.
Code: [Select]
SetUpEditor LRND                   ;Supposed to be the little "L"

Is that what it looks like?
Logged

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #84 on: February 02, 2011, 01:50:17 am »
Quote from: Xeda112358 on February 01, 2011, 10:17:13 pm
Does SetUpEditor work regularly on your calc? I never knew that Basic Builder had problems with that.
Code: [Select]
SetUpEditor LRND                   ;Supposed to be the little "L"
Is that what it looks like?
no, i already found the bug, i put the setupeditor after the unarchiving :P
should work now :P

but progs are also still in BASIC so they are easy to edit. and you can find the bugs

btw, new update (and im going to be late for school XD)

« Last Edit: February 02, 2011, 06:16:08 am by ferox »
Logged
on hold:

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55943
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #85 on: February 02, 2011, 05:51:57 pm »
BasicBuilder has some compatibility issues with some BASIC commands or requires changes. This is why games like Reuben Quest or the Reign of Legends RPG series were never packaged into BasicBuilder.
Logged

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #86 on: February 03, 2011, 02:31:24 am »
interesting... although i do not use any difficult BASIC commands...
well, feel free to test the app, it can only give you a ram clear as far as i know.
but it seems to work pretty well :D

btw, what version of basicbuilder were they using? i'm using 3.0
Logged
on hold:

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #87 on: February 03, 2011, 02:33:59 am »
Quote from: ferox on February 02, 2011, 01:50:17 am
Quote from: Xeda112358 on February 01, 2011, 10:17:13 pm
Does SetUpEditor work regularly on your calc? I never knew that Basic Builder had problems with that.
Code: [Select]
SetUpEditor LRND                   ;Supposed to be the little "L"
Is that what it looks like?
no, i already found the bug, i put the setupeditor after the unarchiving :P
should work now :P

but progs are also still in BASIC so they are easy to edit. and you can find the bugs

btw, new update (and im going to be late for school XD)


If you use SetUpEditor, you don't even need to unarchive. It does it for you :D
Logged

Offline ferox

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Rating: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #88 on: February 03, 2011, 02:34:40 am »
Quote from: Xeda112358 on February 03, 2011, 02:33:59 am
Quote from: ferox on February 02, 2011, 01:50:17 am
Quote from: Xeda112358 on February 01, 2011, 10:17:13 pm
Does SetUpEditor work regularly on your calc? I never knew that Basic Builder had problems with that.
Code: [Select]
SetUpEditor LRND                   ;Supposed to be the little "L"
Is that what it looks like?
no, i already found the bug, i put the setupeditor after the unarchiving :P
should work now :P

but progs are also still in BASIC so they are easy to edit. and you can find the bugs

btw, new update (and im going to be late for school XD)


If you use SetUpEditor, you don't even need to unarchive. It does it for you :D

i was told ;) but thx for the warning :P
Logged
on hold:

Offline Xeda112358

  • they/them
  • Moderator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 4704
  • Rating: +719/-6
  • Calc-u-lator, do doo doo do do do.
    • View Profile
Re: TI 83+/84+ randomness
« Reply #89 on: February 03, 2011, 04:41:23 pm »
Also, if you want an optimisation trick, you can leave off the ending quote. Also, Disp commands can be on the same line. So:
Code: [Select]
Disp "HELLO"can be optimised to:
Code: [Select]
Disp "HELLO
And this:
Code: [Select]
Disp "HELLO"
Disp "WHAT IS"
Disp "YOUR NAME?"Can be:
Code: [Select]
Disp "HELLO","WHAT IS","YOUR NAME?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
« previous next »