I would say to just use the 256 degree angle system as the one the user will use.

Oh, I thought he said a cube. A square would still be two triangles, unless quadrilaterals are supported as a primitive. (There's no real reason to have them, though.)

Good luck Ashbad! This seems like an interesting project. I'm glad you're still doing calc stuff too.

I'd go for speed and teh screenies.  This looks interesting.  I hope you can pull it off.

Yay! 3D. Now we can make minecraft

Sorry to shatter your hopes, but there's just not enough RAM to make that happen.

It would really have to be a tiny version of it, lol. Personally I would rather want to see some other kind of 3D games first, though, then later we can integrate gCn to have multiplayer. I have doubts about the feasibility of 3D+gCn, though. There will definitively need to be as less info as possible being transmitted every few frames.

well, with a whole new overhaul in place, I know how I'll do depth rendering!    I've almost got a line to render great in any camera position, so things are looking better.

Also, this isn't scenegraph based, though -- you'll have to implement a primitive renderloop to update some things as it is right now.  Scenegraphs are really not as feasible on a 84+

Why did you strikethrough that post?

ooh, sounds cool!
i'm glad that this was not forgotten.