Actually yes!  Me and Runer were talking about the possibility of making it an Axiom  ^^  But not until later releases

i very like the way this is looking. i probably won't ever use it for a project, though, because physics is just too fun to completely skip over in the writing process. what's the restitution on those boxes? they bounce a lot.

Alright update with this, I was trying Axe 1.0.2 like you guys suggested, but apparently it has some issue parsing static pointers that is messing majorly with the engine.  0.5.3 doesn't have the static variables, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 are unstable, 1.0.2 can't parse static pointers, and 1.0.3 has problems with multiplication.  There is officially no version of Axe out that can compile Zedd right now So this project is going to have to remain unreleased until I can bug Quigibo to fix the multiplication in Axe 1.0.3

Bump, and to say I got some time to begin a port for Casio.
Buildy, If you get too some times, could you send me a PM? I would like to get some explanations

I though that was on CX CAS :S

Anyway, I ask someprecisions, Zeed is almost non-human readable, and I want to be sure that works too with objects that are bigger/smaller than 8*8

TBH the Zedd source is a lot more readable than I expected it to be. It's really optimized, and if you understand a few pretty easy-to-grasp Axe optimizations, some things will make a lot more sense. I think there's an official thread for Axe opts...

Hey Eiyeron nice to see you again , and nope this was always for the 83+. Written in Axe language

Thanks Captain Obvious! That's why I'm porting it in C ( for a porject, but hush)